Design of a deviation information detection mechanism for sugar beet harvesters based on agricultural machinery and agronomy integration

Authors

  • Shenying Wang 1. Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China 2. College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
  • Jinbo Pan 1. Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China 2. College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
  • Qiang Xiao 4. Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Technology Promotion Center, Hohhot 010000, China
  • Zhaoyan You 1. Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China
  • Jianmei Li 5. Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Technology Promotion Center in Linxi County, Chifeng 025250, China
  • Xuemei Gao 1. Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China
  • Shengshi Xie 3. College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China

Keywords:

Sugar beets?Harvesting?Automatic row alignment?detection mechanism?Agricultural machinery and agronomy integration

Abstract

To address large geometric shape differences, poor ridge distribution straightness, and the uncertain spatial distribution of beet roots during the harvesting period, as well as damage caused by the inaccurate row correction detection mechanisms of combine harvesters, this study conducts a design analysis and performance tests of deviation information detection mechanisms based on the integration of agricultural machinery and agronomy. The agronomic process of mechanized sugar beet production was analyzed, the geometric dimensions of root tubers under typical planting patterns of typical varieties in main sugar beet production areas were measured, and a three-dimensional geometric model of beet root tubers was established. A device for measuring ridge shape and root tuber distribution was designed, and agronomic parameters during the harvesting period, such as plant spacing, ridge height, unearthed height, and deviation distance of beet root tubers, were measured and analyzed. A spatial model of ridge shape and beet root tuber growth distribution on the ridge during harvesting was established. The overall structure of the deviation information detection mechanism was analyzed and designed, and the structural forms and key parameters of key mechanisms, such as left‒right swing detection and up‒down floating profiling, were designed on the basis of agronomic parameter analysis. Using the missed detection rate as the evaluation index, field performance tests of the deviation information detection mechanism were conducted. The results revealed that when the average forward speed of the harvester was 0.84 m/s, the average missed detection rate of the deviation information detection mechanism was 0.56%. This method has high adaptability and detection accuracy and achieves a high level of integration for agricultural machinery (detection spatial region of the detection mechanism) and agronomy (beet root distribution spatial region). This study provides a technical basis and methodological reference for improving the quality and efficiency of automatic row correction combined with harvesting operations for crops such as sugar beets.

Keywords sugar beets; harvesting; automatic row flow; deviation information detection; agricultural machinery and agronomy integration

DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20261901.10135

Citation: Wang S Y, Pan J B, Xiao Q, You Z Y, Li J M, Gao X M, et al. Design of a deviation information detection mechanism for sugar beet harvesters based on agricultural machinery and agronomy integration. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2026; 19(1): 120–131.

Author Biography

Shenying Wang, 1. Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China 2. College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China

Associate Researcher, Ph.D., Outstanding Young Talents of the Institute

References

[1] Wang S Y, Gao X M, You Z Y, Peng B L, Wu H C, Hu Z C, et al. Experiment and parameter optimization of an automatic row following system for the traction beet combine harvester. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2023; 16(1): 145–152.

[2] Wang F Y, Wang D W. Design and test of 4TSQ-2 sugar beet top cutter. Transactions of the CSAE, 2020; 36(2): 70–78.

[3] Wang S Y, Hu Z C, Chen Y Q, Wu H C, Wang Y Y, et al. Integration of agricultural machinery and agronomy for mechanized peanut production using the vine for animal feed. Biosystems Engineering, 219(2022): 135–152. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2022.04.011

[4] Zhang Y Y, Zhang B, Shen C, Liu H L, Huang J C, Tian K P, et al. Review of the field environmental sensing methods based on multi-sensor information fusion technology. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2024; 17(2): 1–13.

[5] Marchant W T B, Chittey E T. Automatic control of sugar beet harvester shares. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 1966; 11(3): 188–200.

[6] Billington W P. The design and development of a skew bar topper for sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 1984; 29(4): 329–335.

[7] O’Dogherty M J. A geometrical model to define the limits of accuracy of sugar beet topping. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 1986; 35(1): 55–66.

[8] Ivancan S, Sito S, Fabijanic G. Factors of the quality of performance of sugar beet combine harvesters. Die Bodenkultur, 2002; 53(3): 161–166.

[9] Tillett N D, Hague T, Miles S J. Inter-row vision guidance for mechanical weed control in sugar beet. Computers & Electronics in Agriculture, 2002; 33(3): 163–177.

[10] Bulgakov V, Arak M, Boris A, Boris M, Bandura V, Olt J. Experimental study of the distribution of the heights of sugar beet root crowns above the soil surface. Agronomy Research, 2019; 17(6): 2211–2219.

[11] Ospina R, Noguchi N. Simultaneous mapping and crop row detection by fusing data from wide angle and telephoto images. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2019; 162(7): 602–612.

[12] Tsukor V, Strothmann W, Schwamm W, Ruckelshausen A. Contactless sensor system for row navigation and automatic depth control for a sugar beet harvester using a 3D time of flight (ToF) camera. Word Conference on Computers in Agriculture and Natural Resources, San Jose Costa Rica, Paper Book, 2014; pp.1–8.

[13] Yang L L, Xu Y Y, Liang Y J, Qin J, Li Y B, Wang X X, et al. Extraction of straight field roads between farmlands based on agricultural vehicle-mounted LiDAR. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2022; 15(5): 155–162.

[14] Ivanetz G, Ovsyanko V, Vyrski A. Computer modeling of beet harvester digging bodies-soil interaction. Journal of Research & Applications in Agricultural Engineering, 2007; 52(1): 8–12.

[15] Bulgakov V, Adamchuk V, Arak M, Olt J. A theoretical study of haulm loss resulting from rotor topper oscillation. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2017; 58: 223–228.

[16] Bulgakov V, Adamchuk V, Nozdrovicky L, Ihnatiev Y. Theory of vibrations of sugar beet leaf harvester front-mounted on universal tractor. Acta Technologica Agriculturae, 2017; 4: 96–103.

[17] Pádua L, Chojka A, Morais R, Peres E, Sousa J J. Versatile method for grapevine row detection in challenging vineyard terrains using aerial imagery. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2024; 226: 109372.

[18] Biglia A, Zaman S, Gay P, Aimonino D R, Comba L. 3D point cloud density-based segmentation for vine rows detection and localization. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2022; 199: 107166.

[19] Bah M D, Hafiane A, Canals R. Hierarchical graph representation for unsupervised crop row detection in images. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023; 216; 119478. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119478

[20] Visentin F, Cremasco S, Sozzi M, Signorini L, Signorini M, Marinello F, Muradore R. A mixed-autonomous robotic platform for intra-row and inter-row weed removal for precision agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2023; 214: 108270.

[21] Rocha B M, Fonseca A U, Pedrini H, Soares F. Automatic detection and evaluation of sugarcane planting rows in aerial images. Information Processing in Agriculture, 2023; 10: 400–415.

[22] Wang S Y, Hu Z C, Peng B L, Wu H C, Gu F W, Wang H O. Simulation of auto-follow row detection mechanism in beet harvester based on ADAMS. Transactions of the CSAM, 2013; 44(12): 62–67.

[23] Wang S Y, Hu Z C, Wu H C, Peng B L, Xie H X, Gu F W. Design and test of hydraulic correction execution system in automated row-followed for beet harvester. Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2016; 38(3): 155–162.

[24] Wang F Y, Zhang D X. Parameter optimization and test on auto guide device for disc type sugar beet harvester. Transactions of the CSAE, 2015; 31(8): 27–33.

[25] Wang F Y, Zhang Z Y, Zhang Q, Wang X. Design optimization and experiment of tooth-plate topping device of sugar beet harvester. Transactions of the CSAM, 2020; 51(11): 168–175.

[26] Wang S Y, Hu Z C, Chen C, Gao X M, Gu F W, Wu H C. Bench test and analysis on performance of autofollow row for traction sugar beet combine harvester. Transactions of the CSAM, 2020; 51(4): 103–112, 163.

[27] Yang R B, Shang S Q, Wang J S, Li X C. Research on auto-follow row technology employed in root-tuber crops harvester. 2011 Annual Conference of CSAE, Chongqing, 2011; pp.138–142.

[28] Hu Y, Zhang K L, Xu L M. Boundary detection for corn combine harvester’s auto-follow row system based on laser radar. 2018 ASABE Annual International Meeting, Detroit, 2018; pp.576–582.

[29] Li T, Zhou J, Xu W Y, Zhang H, Liu C G, Jiang W. Design and test of auto-follow row system employed in root and stem crops harvester. Transactions of the CSAM, 2013; 50(11): 102–110

[30] Han X Z, Kim H J, Chan W J, Hee C M, Jung H K, Sang Y Y. Application of a 3D tractor-driving simulator for slip estimation-based path-tracking control of auto-guided tillage operation. Biosystems Engineering, 2019; 178(2): 70–85.

[31] Zhang K L, Hu Y, Yang L, Zhang D X, Cui T, Fan L L. Design and experiment of auto-follow row system for corn harvester. Transactions of the CSAM, 2020; 51(2): 103–114.

[32] Ma Z H, Tao Z Y, Du X Q, Yu Y X, Wu C Y. Automatic detection of crop root rows in paddy fields based on straight-line clustering algorithm and supervised learning method. Biosystems Engineering, 2021; 211: 63–76.

[33] Ruan Z W, Chang P H, Cui S Q, Luo J Q, Gao R, Su Z B. A precise crop row detection algorithm in complex farmland for unmanned agricultural machines. Biosystems Engineering, 2023; 232: 1–12.

[34] Li D F, Li B L, Long S F, Feng H Q, Xi T, Kang S, Wang J. Rice seedling row detection based on morphological anchor points of rice stems. Biosystems Engineering, 2023; 226: 71–85.

[35] Diao Z H, Guo P L, Zhang B H, Zhang D Y, Yan J N, He Z D, et al. Maize crop row recognition algorithm based on improved UNet network. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2023; 210: 107940.

[36] Luo Y S, Wei L L, Xu L Z, Zhang Q, Liu J Y, Cai Q B, Zhang W B. Stereo-vision-based multi-crop harvesting edge detection for precise automatic steering of combine harvester. Biosystems Engineering, 2022; 215: 115–128.

[37] Wu H C, Hu Z C, Peng B L, Gu F W, Wang H O, Wang B K. Development of auto-follow row system employed in pull-type beet combine harvester. Transactions of the CSAE, 2013; 29(12): 17–24.

[38] Gu F W, Hu Z C, Wu H C, Peng B L, Gao X M, Wang S Y. Development and experiment of 4LT-A staggered-dig sugar beet combine. Transactions of the CSAE, 2014; 30(23): 1–9.

[39] Wang F Y, Zhang Z Y, Pan Y F, Yun Y L, Wang D W. Optimized design of the 4TSQ-2 sugar beet top cutting machine. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2022; 15(2): 111–116.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-16

How to Cite

(1)
Wang, S.; Pan , J.; Xiao , Q.; You, Z.; Li, J.; Gao , X.; Xie, S. Design of a Deviation Information Detection Mechanism for Sugar Beet Harvesters Based on Agricultural Machinery and Agronomy Integration. Int J Agric & Biol Eng 2026, 19.

Issue

Section

Power and Machinery Systems