Daily evapotranspiration estimation using limited meteorological data across diverse geographic regions of China

Authors

  • Wenxu Chen 1. College of Cyber Security, Tarim University, Alar 843300, Xinjiang, China
  • Fei Wang 2. College of Agricultural Equipment Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, China
  • Xingcan Yuwen 2. College of Agricultural Equipment Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, China
  • Yi Shi 2. College of Agricultural Equipment Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, China
  • Xinbo Zhao 3. School of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China

Abstract

Evapotranspiration (ET) is a key component of the water cycle, and accurate estimation of reference crop evapotranspiration (ETo) is essential for irrigation management. To build a precise, lightweight ETo estimation model, this study takes key meteorological factors as inputs and applies machine learning models and hybrid models Crested Porcupine Optimizer kernel extreme learning machine (CPO-KELM), the Dung Beetle Optimizer Algorithm KELM (DBO-KELM), and Particle Swarm Optimization KELM (PSO-KELM) to estimate ETo at 38 meteorological stations across China’s seven major geographical regions. The results indicate that maximum temperature (Tmax), average temperature (Tave), and relative humidity (RH) are the primary factors affecting ETo and were therefore used as model inputs. The standalone kernel extreme learning machine (KELM) model shows acceptable ETo estimation performance, with R2, RMSE, MAE, and NSE ranging from 0.802-0.885, 0.512-0.911, 0.464-0.970, and 0.802-0.885, respectively. Hybrid models outperform the standalone KELM, among which CPO-KELM is the most accurate: its R2, RMSE, MAE, and NSE range from 0.881-0.942, 0.413-1.147, 0.284-0.763, and 0.881-0.942. At the regional scale, the CPO-KELM model exhibits its best performance in the Northeast and North China regions, with R2, RMSE, MAE, and NSE ranging from 0.923-0.936, 0.413-0.511, 0.284-0.358, and 0.923-0.936, respectively. In contrast, its weakest performance is observed in parts of South China and Northwest China, with R2, RMSE, MAE, and NSE ranging from 0.881-0.905, 0.675-1.147, 0.506-0.763, and 0.881-0.905. Compared to standalone KELM, CPO-KELM improves accuracy significantly: R2 and NSE rise by 6.4%-9.9%, while MAE drops by 21.3%-38.8%. Thus, the hybrid CPO-KELM model effectively enhances ETo estimation accuracy across China’s regions. Therefore, the proposed CPO-KELM hybrid model provides a high-accuracy and lightweight alternative for ETo estimation in data-scarce regions, and offers reliable technical support for intelligent water resources management and irrigation optimization across diverse climatic zones in China.

Keywords: ETo, seven major geographical regions, machine learning algorithm, lightweight model

DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20261901.10161

Citation: Chen W X, Wang F, Yu W X C, Shi Y, Zhao X B. Daily evapotranspiration estimation using limited meteorological data across diverse geographic regions of China. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2026; 19(1): 241–250.

References

[1] Wu Z J, Cui N B, Zhu B, Zhao L, Wang X K, Hu X T, et al. Improved hargreaves model based on multiple intelligent optimization algorithms to estimate reference crop evapotranspiration in humid areas of southwest China. Atmosphere, 2021; 12(1): 15.

[2] Xu Y, Xu Y P, Wang Y F, Wu L, Li G, Song S. Spatial and temporal trends of reference crop evapotranspiration and its influential variables in Yangtze River Delta, eastern China. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2017; 130: 945–958.

[3] Cunha A C, Gabriel Filho L R A, Tanaka A A, Goes B C, Putti F F. Influence of the estimated global solar radiation on the reference evapotranspiration obtained through the Penman-Monteith FAO 56 method. Agricultural Water Management, 2021; 243: 106491.

[4] He H, Wu Z, Li D D, Zhang T C, Pan F F, Yuan H W, et al. Characteristics of winter wheat evapotranspiration in eastern china and comparative evaluation of applicability of different reference evapotranspiration models. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2022; 22: 2078–2091.

[5] Zhao L, Xing L W, Wang Y H, Cui N B, Zhou H M, Shi Y, et al. Prediction model for reference crop evapotranspiration based on the back-propagation algorithm with limited factors. Water Resources Management, 2023; 37: 1207–1222.

[6] Yong S L S, Ng J L, Huang Y F, Ang C K. Estimation of reference crop evapotranspiration with three different machine learning models and limited meteorological variables. Agronomy-Basel, 2023; 13(4): 1048.

[7] Tejada A T, Ella V B, Lampayan R M, Reano C E. Modeling reference crop evapotranspiration using support vector machine (SVM) and extreme learning machine (ELM) in region IV-A, Philippines. Water, 2022; 14(5): 754.

[8] Bellido-Jimenez J A, Estevez J, Vanschoren J, Garcia-Marin A P. AgroML: an open-source repository to forecast reference evapotranspiration in different geo-climatic conditions using machine learning and transformer-based models. Agronomy-Basel, 2022; 12: 656.

[9] Gong D Z, Hao W P, Gao L L, Feng Y, Cui N B. Extreme learning machine for reference crop evapotranspiration estimation: Model optimization and spatiotemporal assessment across different climates in China. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2021; 187: 106294.

[10] Zhao X B, Li Y Z, Zhao Z H, Xing X G, Feng G H, Bai J Y, et al. Prediction model for daily reference crop evapotranspiration based on hybrid algorithm in semi-arid regions of China. Atmosphere, 2022; 13(6): 922.

[11] Sebastian J, Raj S K, Shihabudheen K V. Adaptive control of a nonaffine nonlinear system using self-organising kernel extreme learning machine. Isa Transactions, 2024; 146: 567–581.

[12] Tian S C, Ma L, Li H X, Tian F Y, Mao J R. Research on a coal seam gas content prediction method based on an improved extreme learning machine. Applied Sciences-Basel, 2023; 13(15): 8753.

[13] Zhao L, Zhao X B, Li Y Z, Shi Y, Zhou H M, Li X Z, et al. Applicability of hybrid bionic optimization models with kernel-based extreme learning machine algorithm for predicting daily reference evapotranspiration: a case study in arid and semiarid regions, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023; 30: 22396–22412.

[14] Fan Y L, Ma Z, Tang W W, Liang J, Xu P F. Using crested porcupine optimizer algorithm and CNN-LSTM-attention model combined with deep learning methods to enhance short-term power forecasting in PV generation. Energies, 2024; 17(14): 3435.

[15] Zhang Z Q, Zhang L L, Liu D, Sun N, Li M, Faiz M A, et al. Measurement and analysis of regional water-energy-food nexus resilience with an improved hybrid kernel extreme learning machine model based on a dung beetle optimization algorithm. Agricultural Systems, 2024; 218: 103966.

[16] Jia Y, Wang H, Li P C, Su Y J, Wang F C, Huo S Y. Particle swarm optimization algorithm with Gaussian exponential model to predict daily and monthly global solar radiation in Northeast China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023; 30: 12769–12784.

[17] Fei S W, Liu Y Z. Fault diagnosis method of bearing utilizing GLCM and MBASA-based KELM. Scientific Reports, 2022; 12: 17368.

[18] Ma J, Liang S T, Du Z Y, Chen M. Compound fault diagnosis of rolling bearing based on ALIF-KELM. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021; 2021: 2636302.

[19] Abdel-Basset M, Mohamed R, Abouhawwash M. Crested porcupine optimizer: A new nature-inspired metaheuristic. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2024; 284: 111257.

[20] Liu H J, Zhou R, Zhong X Y, Yao Y, Shan W F, Yuan J, et al. Multi-strategy enhanced crested porcupine optimizer: CAPCPO. Mathematics, 2024; 12(19): 3080.

[21] Xue J K, Shen B. Dung beetle optimizer: A new meta-heuristic algorithm for global optimization. The Journal of Supercomputing, 2022; 79: 7305–7336.

[22] Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of ICNN’95-International conference on neural networks, Perth, WA, Australia: IEEE, 1995; pp.1942–1948. doi: 10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968

[23] Singh A, Kukal M S, Shapiro C A, Snow D D, Irmak S, Iqbal J. Growth phase-specific evaporative demand and nighttime temperatures determine Maize (Zea Mays L.) yield deviations as revealed from a long-term field experiment. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2021; 308–309: 108543. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108543.

[24] Despotovic M, Nedic V, Despotovic D, Cvetanovic S. Review and statistical analysis of different global solar radiation sunshine models. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015; 52: 1869–1880.

[25] Emeka N, Ikenna O, Okechukwu M, Chinenye A, Emmanuel E. Sensitivity of FAO Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration (ETo) to climatic variables under different climate types in Nigeria. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 2021; 12(3): 858–878.

[26] Heramb P, Ramana Rao K V, Subeesh A, Srivastava A. Predictive modelling of reference evapotranspiration using machine learning models coupled with grey wolf optimizer. Water, 2023; 15(5): 856.

[27] Wu X J, Wu X M, Huang H C, Zhang F G, Wen Y X. Characterization of pepper ripeness in the field using hyperspectral imaging (HSI) with back propagation (BP) neural network and kernel based extreme learning machine (KELM) models. Analytical Letters, 2024; 57(3): 409–424.

[28] Suo L M, Liu H L, Ni J, Wang Z W, Zhao R. Sunflower origin identification based on multi-source information fusion technique of kernel extreme learning machine. Agronomy-Basel, 2024; 14(6): 1320.

[29] Peng S Q, Sun Q Z, Fan L, Zhou J, Zhuo X D. Optimized kernel extreme learning machine using Sine Cosine Algorithm for prediction of unconfined compression strength of MICP cemented soil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024; 31: 24868–24880.

[30] Wu Z J, Cui N B, Hu X T, Gong D Z, Wang Y S, Feng Y, et al. Optimization of extreme learning machine model with biological heuristic algorithms to estimate daily reference crop evapotranspiration in different climatic regions of China. Journal of Hydrology, 2021; 603: 127028.

[31] Hu J, Ma R, Jiang S Z, Liu Y L, Mao H Y. Prediction of reference crop evapotranspiration in China’s climatic regions using optimized machine learning models. Water, 2024; 16: 3349.

[32] Yang L S, Feng Q, Adamowski J F, Yin Z L, Wen X H, Wu M, et al. Erratum to ‘Spatio-temporal variation of reference evapotranspiration in northwest China based on CORDEX-EA’ [Atmos. Res. 238 (2020) 104868]. Atmospheric Research, 2021; 252: 105425.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-16

How to Cite

(1)
Chen, W.; Wang, F.; Yuwen, X.; Shi, Y.; Zhao, X. Daily Evapotranspiration Estimation Using Limited Meteorological Data across Diverse Geographic Regions of China. Int J Agric & Biol Eng 2026, 19.

Issue

Section

Information Technology, Sensors and Control Systems