Evaluation of nesting behavior of individual laying hens in an enriched colony housing by using RFID technology

Jofran L. Oliveira, Hongwei Xin, Kailao Wang, Yang Zhao

Abstract


The US egg industry is progressively adopting alternative housing systems for laying hens. Provision of nesting places accommodates natural behaviors and may improve the welfare of the laying hen. However, some fundamental questions remain about nesting behaviors of hens under different housing conditions, which would impact system design and management. For instance, how long does a hen use nest per day for egg laying or nest exploration? How many hens nest simultaneously? In such schemes, information on hens’ behavioral and production responses of hens remains relatively sparse. The primary objective of this work was to demonstrate that RFID technology can be used to continuously quantify dynamic nesting behaviors of individual laying hens in a 60-hen enriched colony housing (ECH). Results show that hens spent on average 63.7±1.4 min (mean±SE) in the nest box and made 23.4±0.7 nest visits during a 16 h daily light period. Time spent in and visits to the nest box during the 6 h laying period accounted for 56% and 45% of the light-period value, respectively. Maximum nest occupancy was 29.0%±0.4%. Three distinct phases of egg production in nest boxes were observed: initial (1.5 h), peak (3.2 h, egg laying rate of 0.24±0.01 eggs/min), and late (1.3 h). The majority (95.1%±0.6%) of the daily eggs were laid in the nest box. Considerable variations in nesting behavior among individual hens and day-to-day variations for a given hen were observed. The RFID system will enable researchers to examine the impacts of resource allocations on nesting behaviors of laying hens in alternative hen housing.
Keywords: animal welfare, egg production, RFID, alternative hen housing, individual behaviors
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20191206.5129

Citation: Oliveira J L, Xin H W, Wang K L, Zhao Y. Evaluation of nesting behavior of individual laying hens in an enriched colony housing by using RFID technology. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2019; 12(6): 7–15.

Keywords


animal welfare, egg production, RFID, alternative hen housing, individual behaviors

Full Text:

PDF

References


Lay D C, Fulton R M, Hester P Y, Karcher D M, Kjaer J B, Mench J A, et al. Hen welfare in different housing systems. Poultry Science, 2011; 90(1): 278-294.

Appleby M C, Hughes B O. Welfare of laying hens in cages and alternative systems: environmental, physical and behavioural aspects. Worlds Poult Sci J, 1991; 47(2): 109–128.

Tauson R. Management and housing systems for layers – effects on welfare and production. Proc Nutr Soc, 2005; 61(3): 477–490.

Ochs D S, Wolf C A, Widmar N J O, Bir C. Consumer perceptions of egg-laying hen housing systems. Poultry Science, 2018; 97(10): 3390–3396.

Mench J A. Farm animal welfare in the U.S.A.: Farming practices, research, education, regulation, and assurance programs. Appl Anim Behav Sci., 2008; 113(4): 298–312.

Chai L, Xin H, Zhao Y, Wang T, Soupir M, Liu K. Mitigating ammonia and PM generation of cage-free henhouse litter with solid additive and liquid spray. Trans ASABE, 2018; 61(1): 287–294.

Cooper J J, Appleby M C. Nesting behaviour of hens: Effects of experience on motivation. Appl Anim Behav Sci., 1995; 42(4): 283–295.

Struelens E, Van Nuffel A, Tuyttens F A M, Audoorn L, Vranken E, Zoons J, et al. Influence of nest seclusion and nesting material on pre-laying behaviour of laying hens. Appl Anim Behav Sci., 2008; 12(1-2): 106–119.

Struelens E, Tuyttens F A M, Janssen A, Leroy T, Audoorn L, Vranken E, et al. Design of laying nests in furnished cages: influence of nesting material, nest box position and seclusion. Br Poult Sci., 2005; 46(1): 9–15.

Zupan M, Kruschwitz A, Huber-Eicher B. The influence of light intensity during early exposure to colours on the choice of nest colours by laying hens. Appl Anim Behav Sci., 2007; 105(1-3): 154–164.

Ringgenberg N, Fröhlich E K F F, Harlander-Matauschek A, Toscano M J, Würbel H, Roth B A. Effects of variation in nest curtain design on pre-laying behaviour of domestic hens. Appl Anim Behav Sci., 2015; 170: 34–43.

Nicol C J. Development, direction, and damage limitation: Social learning in domestic fowl. Anim Learn Behav., 2004; 32(1): 72–81.

Krause E T, Schrader L. High, low, or familiar? Nest site preferences of experienced laying hens. Br Poult Sci., 2018; 59(4): 359–364.

Cooper J J, Appleby M C. Individual variation in prelaying behaviour and the incidence of floor eggs. Br Poult Sci., 1996; 37(2): 245–253.

Freire R, Appleby M C, Hughes B O. Assessment of pre-laying motivation in the domestic hen using social interaction. Anim Behav., 1997; 54(2): 313–319.

Reynard M, Savory C. Oviposition delays induced by social stress are reversed by treatment with the beta-adrenergic blocking agent propranolol. Poult Sci., 1997; 76(9): 1315–1317.

Appleby M C, Smith S F. Design of nest boxes for laying cages. Br Poult Sci., 1991; 32(4): 667–678.

Lundberg A, Keeling L J. The impact of social factors on nesting in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Appl Anim Behav Sci., 1999; 64(1): 57–69.

Riber A B. Development with age of nest box use and gregarious nesting in laying hens. Appl Anim Behav Sci., 2010; 123(1-2): 24–31.

Appleby M C, Maguire S N, McRae H E. Nesting and floor laying by domestic hens in a commercial flock. Br Poult Sci., 1986; 27(1): 75–82.

Shi H P, Zheng W C, Tu J, Li B M. Reducing feather pecking and cloacal cannibalism by providing layer breeders with nest boxes in colony cages for natural mating. Int J Agric Biol Eng, 2018;11(6): 27–32.

Voulodimos A S, Patrikakis C Z, Sideridis A B, Ntafis V A, Xylouri E M. A complete farm management system based on animal identification using RFID technology. Comput Electron Agric., 2010; 70(2): 380–388.

Brown-Brandl T M, Eigenberg R A. Development of a livestock feeding behavior monitoring system. Am Soc Agric Biol Eng, 2011; 54(5): 1913–20.

Maselyne J, Saeys W, De Ketelaere B, Mertens K, Vangeyte J, Hessel E F, et al. Validation of a high frequency radio frequency identification (HF RFID) system for registering feeding patterns of growing-finishing pigs. Comput Electron Agric., 2014; 102: 10–18.

Li G, Zhao Y, Hailey R, Zhang N, Liang Y, Purswell J L. An ultra-high frequency radio frequency identification system for studying individual feeding and drinking behaviors of group-housed broilers. Animal, 2019; 13(9): 2060–2069.

Nakarmi A, Tang L, Xin H. Automated tracking and behavior quantification of laying hens using 3D computer vision and radio frequency identification technologies. Trans ASABE, 2014; 57: 1455–1472.

Sales G T, Green A R, Gates R S, Brown-Brandl T M, Eigenberg R A. Quantifying detection performance of a passive low-frequency RFID system in an environmental preference chamber for laying hens. Comput Electron Agric., 2015; 114: 261–268.

Campbell D L M, Hinch G N, Downing J A, Lee C. Outdoor stocking density in free-range laying hens: effects on behaviour and welfare. animal, 2017; 11(6): 1036–1045.

Siegford J, Berezowski J, Biswas S, Daigle C, Gebhardt-Henrich S, Hernandez C, et al. Assessing Activity and Location of Individual Laying Hens in Large Groups Using Modern Technology. Animals, 2016; 6(2): 10.

Marx G, Klein S, Weigend S. An automated nest box system for individual performance testing and parentage control in laying hens maintained in groups. Arch fur Geflugelkd, 2002; 66(3): 141–144.

Thurner S, Wendl G, Preisinger R. Funnel nest box: a system for automatic recording of individual performance and behaviour of laying hens in floor management. XII Eur Poult Conf Italy, Sept 10-14, 2006; pp.610–611.

Li L, Zhao Y, Oliveira J, Verhoijsen W, Liu K, Xin H. A UHF RFID system for studying individual feeding and nesting behaviors of group-housed laying hens. Trans ASABE, 2017; 60(4): 1337–1347.

Oliveira J L, Xin H, Wu H. Impact of feeder space on laying hen feeding behavior and production performance in enriched colony housing. Animal, 2018; 2004: 1–10.

Rietveld-Piepers B, Blokhuis H J, Wiepkema P R. Egg-laying behaviour and nest-site selection of domestic hens kept in small floor-pens. Appl Anim Behav Sci., 1985; 14(1): 75–88.

Reynard M, Savory C J. Stress-induced oviposition delays in laying hens: Duration and consequences for eggshell quality. Br Poult Sci., 1999; 40(5): 585–591.

Shimmura T, Eguchi Y, Uetake K, Tanaka T. Effects of separation of resources on behaviour of high-, medium- and low-ranked hens in furnished cages. Appl Anim Behav Sci., 2008; 113(1-3): 74–86.

Stämpfli K, Roth B A, Buchwalder T, Fröhlich E K F. Influence of nest-floor slope on the nest choice of laying hens. Appl Anim Behav Sci., 2011; 135(4): 286–292.

Wall H, Tauson R, Elwinger K. Pop hole passages and welfare in furnished cages for laying hens. Br Poult Sci., 2004; 45(1): 20–27.

Cronin G M, Barnett J L, Hemsworth P H. The importance of pre-laying behaviour and nest boxes for laying hen welfare: a review. Animal Production Science, 2012; 52(7): 398-405.

Tactacan G B, Guenter W, Lewis N J, Rodriguez-Lecompte J C, House J D. Performance and welfare of laying hens in conventional and enriched cages. Poult Sci., 2009; 88(4): 698–707.

Buchwalder T, Fröhlich E K. Assessment of colony nests for laying hens in conjunction with the authorization procedure. Appl Anim Behav Sci., 2011; 134(1-2): 64–71.

Ringgenberg N, Fröhlich E K F F, Harlander-Matauschek A, Würbel H, Roth B A. Does nest size matter to laying hens? Appl Anim Behav Sci., 2014; 155: 66–73.

Wood-Gush D G M, Vestergaard K. Exploratory behavior and the welfare of intensively kept animals. J Agric Ethics., 1989; 2(2): 161–169.

Villanueva S, Ali A B A, Campbell D L M, Siegford J M. Nest use and patterns of egg laying and damage by 4 strains of laying hens in an aviary system. Poult Sci., 2017; 96(9): 3011–3020.

Lentfer T L, Gebhardt-Henrich S G, Fröhlich E K F, von Borell E. Influence of nest site on the behaviour of laying hens. Appl Anim Behav Sci., 2011; 135(1-2): 70–77.

Appleby M C, McRae H E, Peitz B E. The effect of light on the choice of nests by domestic hens. Appl Anim Ethol., 1984; 11(3): 249–254.

Hunniford M E, Torrey S, Bédécarrats G, Duncan I J H H, Widowski T M. Evidence of competition for nest sites by laying hens in large furnished cages. Appl Anim Behav Sci., 2014; 161: 95–104.

Hunniford M E, Woolcott C, Siegford J, Widowski T M. Nesting behavior of Hy-Line hens in modified enriched colony cages. Poult Sci., 2017; 96(6):1515–1523.

Odihambo Mumma J, Thaxton J P, Vizzier-Thaxton Y, Dodson W L. Physiological stress in laying hens. Poult Sci., 2006; 85(4): 761–769.

Oliveira J L, Xin H, Chai L, Millman S T. Effects of litter floor access and inclusion of experienced hens in aviary housing on floor eggs , litter condition , air quality, and hen welfare. Poultry Science, 2019; 98(4): 1664–1677.

Taylor T G. How an eggshell is made. Scientific American, 1970; 222(3): 88–97.

Perrins C M. Eggs, egg formation and the timing of breeding. Ibis (Lond 1859), 1996; 138(1): 2–15.

Wolc A, Jankowski T, Arango J, Settar P, Fulton J E, O’Sullivan N P, et al. Investigating the genetic determination of clutch traits in laying hens. Poult Sci., 2019; 98(1): 39–45.

Samiullah S, Roberts J, Chousalkar K. Oviposition time, flock age, and egg position in clutch in relation to brown eggshell color in laying hens. Poult Sci., 2016; 95(9): 2052–2057.

Hunniford M E, Widowski T M. Rearing environment and laying location affect pre-laying behaviour in enriched cages. Appl Anim Behav Sci., 2016; 181: 205–213.

Abeyesinghe S M, Drewe J A, Asher L, Wathes C M, Collins L M. Do hens have friends? Appl Anim Behav Sci., 2013; 143(1): 61–66.




Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office