Climate change impacts on streamflow, water quality, and best management practices for the Shell and Logan Creek Watersheds in Nebraska, USA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25165/ijabe.v5i1.570Keywords:
hydrology, water quality, model calibration, climate change, SWATAbstract
Abstract: Improvements in the management of water, sediment, and nutrients under future climatic conditions are needed to ensure increased crop and livestock production to meet greater global needs and the future availability of water for competing demands and protection against adverse water quality impairments. This study determined the impacts of future climate change scenarios on streamflow, water quality, and best management practices (BMPs) for two watersheds in Nebraska, USA. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was employed to simulate streamflow, sediment, total nitrogen (N) and total phosphorus (P) from the Shell Creek Watershed near Columbus, Nebraska and the Logan Creek Watershed near Sioux City, Iowa. Available streamflow and water quality records for the two watersheds were used to calibrate model parameters that govern streamflow, sediment, and nutrient responses in SWAT. For each watershed, precipitation, air temperature, and CO2 concentrations were input to SWAT for four climatic conditions: a baseline condition for the 1980 to 2000 period and the SRES A2, A1B, and B1 climate scenarios for a future period from 2040 to 2059. Findings from this study suggest that under the three future climate change scenarios, sediment losses are expected to be about 1.2 to 1.5 times greater than the baseline condition for Shell Creek and 2 to 2.5 times greater for Logan Creek; total N losses are expected to be about 1.2 to 1.4 times greater for Shell Creek and 1.7 to 1.9 times greater for Logan Creek. Relative to the baseline, total P losses under the future climate scenarios are projected to be about the same for Shell Creek and 1.5 to 1.7 times greater for Logan Creek. Findings from this study also suggest that future projected increases in both precipitation and CO2 concentration account for net increases in streamflow, but in different ways on each watershed. Keywords: hydrology, water quality, model calibration, climate change, SWAT DOI: 10.3965/j.ijabe.20120501.003 Citation: Van Liew M W, Feng S, Pathak T B. Climate change impacts on streamflow, water quality, and best management practices for the Shell and Logan Creek Watersheds in Nebraska, USA. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2012; 5(1): 13References
Tomer M D, Schilling K E. A simple approach to
distinguish land-use and climate-change effects on watershed
hydrology. J Environ Qual, 2009; 376: 24-33.
Hurd B H, Callaway M, Smith J, Kirshen P. Climatic
change and US water resources: from modeled watershed
impacts to national estimates. J Am Water Resour Assoc,
; 40(1): 129-148.
Gleick P H, Chalecki E L. The impacts of climatic changes
for water resources of the Colorado and Sacramento-San
Joaquin River Basins. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 1999;
(6): 1429-1441.
Murdoch P S, Baron J S, Miller T L. Potential effects of
climate change on surface-water quality in North America. J
Am Water Resour Assoc, 2000; 36(2): 347-366.
Hauser R, Archer S, Backlund P, Hatfield J, Janetos A,
Lettenmaier D, et al. The effects of climate change on U.S.
Ecosystems. U.S. Global Change Research Program.
Karl T R, Melillo J M, Peterson T C. Global climate change
impacts in the United States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Global
Change Research Program. 2009. Available at:
http://downloads.globalchange.gov/usimpacts/pdfs/climate-i
mpacts-report.pdf
Jha M, Arnold J G, Gassman P W, Giorgi F, Gu R R .
Climate change sensitivity assessment on Upper Mississippi
River Basin streamflows using SWAT. J Am Water Resour
Assoc, 2006; 42(4): 997-1016.
Mehta V M, Rosenberg N J,Mendoza K. Simulated impacts of
three decadal climate variability phenomena on water yields in
the Missouri River Basin. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 2011;
(1): 126–135. Doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010. 00496.x.
Stone M C, Hotchkiss R C, Mearnes L O. Water yield
responses to high and low spatial resolution climate change
scenarios in the Missouri River Basin. Geophys Res Lett,
; 30(4), 1186. Doi:10.1029/2220GLO16122.
Takle E S, Jha M, Lu E, Arritt R W, Gutowski W J, the
NARCCAP Team . Streamflow in the upper Mississippi river
basin as simulated by SWAT driven by 20th Century
contemporary results of global climate models and
NARCCAP regional climate models. Meteorologische
Zeitschrift, 19(4): 341-346. Doi: 10.1127/0941-2948/2010/
Woznicki S A, Nejadhashemi A P. Sensitivity analysis of
best management practices under climate change scenarios. J
Am Water Resour Assoc, 2011; 1-23. Doi:
1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00598.x
Woznicki S A, Nejadhashemi A P, Smith C M. Assessing
best management practice implementation strategies under
climate change scenarios. Trans ASABE, 2011; 54(1):
-190.
Lioubimtseva E, Cole R, Adams J M, Kapustin G . Impacts
of climate and land-cover changes in arid lands of Central
Asia. J Arid Environ, 2005; 62(2): 285-308.
Tollan A. Land use change and floods: what do we need
most research or management? Water Sci Technol, 2002;
: 183-190.
Jackson R B, Carpenter S R, Dahm C N, McKnight D M,
Naiman R J, Postel S L, et al. Water in a changing world.
Ecol Appl, 2001; 11(4): 1027-1045.
Marshall, E, Randhir, T. Effect of climate change on
watershed system: a regional analysis. Climate Change,
; 89(3-4): 263-280.
Wilby R L, Orr H G, Hedger M, Forrow D, Blackmore M.
Risks posed by climate change to the delivery of water
framework Directive objectives in the UK. Environ Int,
; 32(8): 1043-1055.
Chen C W, Herr J W, Goldstein R A, Ice G, Cundy T.
Retrospective comparison of watershed analysis risk
March, 2012 Climate change impacts on streamflow, water quality, and BMP for the shell and logan creek watersheds Vol. 5 No.1 33
management framework and hydrologic simulation program
fortran applications to Mica Creek watershed. J Environ
Eng, ASCE, 2005; Vol. 131(9): 1277-1284.
Goldstein R A. Watershed analysis risk management
framework (WARMF): Update One. Topical Report. EPRI,
Palo Alto, CA, 2001. Available at: http://www2.bren.
ucsb.edu/~keller/courses/esm224/old/WARMFTechDoc.pdf.
Accessed on [2012-02-08]
Goncu S, Albek E. Modeling climate change effects on
streams and reservoirs with HSPF. Water Resour Manag,
; 24:707-726.
Jacomino V M F, Fields D E. A critical approach to the
calibration of a watershed model. J Am Water Resour
Assoc, 1997; 33(1): 143–154.
Arnold J G, Srinivasan R, Muttiah R S, Williams J R.
Large-area hydrologic modeling and assessment: Part I.
Model development. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 1998; 34(1):
-89.
Gassman P W, Reyes M R, Green C H, Amold J G. The Soil
and Water Assessment Tool: historical development,
applications, and future research directions. Trans ASABE,
; 50(4): 1211-1250.
Fan J, Tian F, Yang Y, Han S, Qiu G. Quantifying the
magnitude of the impact of climate change and human
activity on runoff decline in Mian River Basin, China. Water
Sci Technol, 2010; 62(4): 783-791.
Fricklin D L, Luo Y, Luedeling E, Gatzke S E, Zhang M.
Sensitivity of agricultural runoff loads to rising levels of CO2
and climate change in the San Joaquin Valley of California.
Environ Pollut, 2010; 158: 223-234.
Githui F, Gitau W, Mutua F, Bauwens W. Climate change
impact on SWAT simulated streamflow in western Kenya. Int
J Clim, 2009; 29: 1823-1834.
Park M J, Park J Y, Shin H J, Lee M S, Park G A, Jung I K,
Kim S J. Projection of future climate change impacts on
nonpoint source pollution loads for a forest dominant dam
watershed by reflecting future vegetation canopy in a Soil
and Water Assessment Tool model. Water Sci Technol,
; 61(8): 1975-1986.
Singh A, Gosain A K. Climate-change impact assessment
using GIS-based hydrological modeling. Water Int, 2011;
Vol. 36(3): 386-397.
Somura H, Takeda I, Mori Y. Sensitivity analyses of
hydrologic and suspended sediment discharge in the Abashiri
River basin, Hokkaido region, Japan. Int Agric Eng J,
;18(1-2): 27-39.
Li Z, Liu W Z, Zhang X C, Zheng F L. Assessing and
regulating the impacts of climate change on water resources
in the Heihe watershed on the Loess Plateau of China. Sci
China Earth Sci, 2010; 53(5): 710-720.
Arnold J G, Allen P M. Estimating hydrologic budgets for
three Illinois watersheds. J Hydrol, 1996; 176, 57–77.
Arnold J G, Srinivasan R, Muttiah R S, Allen P M.
Continental scale simulation of the hydrologic balance. J Am
Water Resour Assoc, 1999; 35(5): 1037-1052.
USDA-NRCS. Chapter 10: Estimation of direct runoff from
storm rainfall. In NRCS National Engineering Handbook, Part
: Hydrology. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2004.
Available: http://directives.sc.egov.usda.gov/viewerFS.aspx?
hid=21422. Accessed on [2012-02-08].
Monteith J L. Evaporation and the environment. In: The
State and Movement of Water in Living Organisms. XIXt
Symposium, Soc. for Exp. Biol., Swansea, Cambridge
University Press, 1965; pp 205-234.
Neitsch S L, Arnold J G, Kiniry J R, Williams J R. Soil and
water assessment tool theoretical documentation version
Texas Water Resources Institute Technical Report
No. 406. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. 2011.
Available at: http://swatmodel.tamu.edu/documentation/.
Accessed on [2012-02-08].
Williams J R. Sediment routing for agricultural watersheds.
Water Resour Bull, 1975; 11(5): 965-974.
Laflen J M, Moldenhauer W C. Pioneering soil erosion
prediction: The USLE Story. Special Publication No. 1
Beijing, China: World Association of Soil and Water
Conservation. 2003. Available: http://homepage2.com/
nifty.com/waswc/WASWC%20Strage/S-Publication/USLE_
book_for_web.pdf. Accessed on [2012-02-07].
Brown L C, Barnwell T O. The enhanced water quality
models: QUAL2E and QAL2E_UNCAS documentation and
user manual. EPA/600/3-87/007. Athens, GA: U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency . 1987.
USGS. National Elevation Dataset. Reston, Virginia: U.S.
Geological Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior. 2006.
Available: http://ned.usgs.gov/. Accessed on [2012-02-07].
USGS. National Land Cover Database 2001 (NLCD2001).
Reston, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Department
of the Interior. 2011. Available: http://www.mrlc.gov/
nlcd2001.php. Accessed on [2012-02-07].
USDA-NRCS. State Soil Geographic (STATSG0) Data Base:
Data use information. Publication Number 1492. Lincoln,
Nebraska: National Soil Survey Center, Natural Resources
Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1994.
Available at: http://dbwww.essc.psu.edu/dbtop/doc/statsgo/
statsgo_db.pdf. Accessed on [2012-02-07].
SWAT. ArcSWAT: ArcGIS-ArcView extension and
graphical user input interface for SWAT. College Station,
Texas: Spatial Sciences Laboratory, Texas A&M University.
Available at: http://swatmodel.tamu.edu/support/Texas.
March, 2012 Int J Agric & Biol Eng Open Access at http://www.ijabe.org Vol. 5 No.1
Accessed on [2012-02-07].
NCDC. NNDC Climate Data Online. Asheville, North
Carolina: U.S. National Climate Data Center, 2012. Available
at: http://www7.ncdc.noaa.gov/CDO/cdo. Accessed on
-02-09].
USGS. USGS Surface-Water Data for the Nation. Reston,
Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Department of the
Interior, 2012. Available at: http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/
sw. Accessed on [2011-01-15].
Shrestha R R, Dibike Y B, Prowse T D. Modeling of
climate-induced hydrologic changes in the Lake Winnipeg
Watershed. J. Great Lakes Res, 2011; DOI:
1016/j.jglr.2011.02.004.
Zhang H, Huang G H, Wang D, Zhang X. Uncertainty
assessment of climate change impacts on the hydrology of
small prairie watersheds, 2011; J. of Hydrology.
:94-103.
Meehl G A, Covey C, Delworth T, Latif M, Bryant M,
Michell J F B. The WCRP CMIP3 multi-model dataset: A
new era in climate change research, Bull Amer Meteorol Soc,
; 88, 1383–1394.
Maurer E P, Adam J C, Wood A W. Climate model based
consensus on the hydrologic impacts of climate change to the
Rio Lempa basin of Central America, Hydrol Earth System
Sci, 2009; 13, 183–194.
Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Davis G, Vries B, Fenhann J,
Gaffin S, et al. Special Report on Emissions Scenarios: A
Special Report of Working Group III of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, U.K.,
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
IJABE is an international peer reviewed open access journal, adopting Creative Commons Copyright Notices as follows.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
