Experimental investigation on spray characteristics of agricultural full-cone pressure swirl nozzle

Xiuyun Xue, Xufeng Xu, Shilei Lyu, Shuran Song, Xin Ai, Nengchao Li, Zhenyu Yang, Zhen Li

Abstract


The spray characteristics of a full-cone pressure swirl nozzle have been investigated in this study. The results were defined by Reynolds number, which focuses on the breakup of liquid film, droplet size, velocity, and liquid volume flux under different Reynolds numbers at the near-field spray. The spray structure was visualized using a high-speed camera, and the characteristics of droplets were measured using a Phase Doppler Anemometer (PDA) in both the radial and axial directions. The tests were carried out at varying spray pressures (0.2 to 1.0 MPa), corresponding to different Reynolds numbers (5369 to 12006). It was found that when the Reynolds number rises, the liquid became more unstable after leaving the nozzle, causing the liquid film to break up faster. According to the measurements of PDA, the coalescence of droplets increased due to the centrifugal effect. What’s more, the velocity of the droplets fluctuates significantly in the radial direction, and the droplets with a smaller particle size had a higher average velocity. From the perspective of liquid distribution, the increase in Reynolds number caused the spray liquid to move in the radial direction gradually. In contrast, the liquid volume distribution changed in the radial direction more obviously than in the axial direction, growing to the maximum along the radial direction and gradually reducing. It can provide a reference for selecting operating parameters for actual agricultural spray operations and the design of electrostatic nozzles through the research on breakup and droplet characteristics.
Keywords: full-cone pressure swirl nozzle, droplet size, droplet velocity, liquid volume flux, high-speed camera, PDA
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20231604.7088

Citation: Xue X Y, Xu X F, Lyu S L, Song S R, Ai X, Li N C, et al. Experimental investigation on spray characteristics of agricultural full-cone pressure swirl nozzle. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2023; 16(4): 29–40.

Keywords


agricultural engineering

Full Text:

PDF

References


Laryea G N, No S. Development of electrostatic pressure-swirl nozzle for agricultural applications. Journal of Electrostatics, 2003; 57(2): 129-42. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3886(02)00122-5.

Belhadef A, Vallet A, Amielh M, Anselmet F. Pressure-swirl atomization: Modeling and experimental approaches. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2012; 39: 13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2011.09.009.

Santolaya J L, Aísa L A, Calvo E, García I, García JA. Analysis by droplet size classes of the liquid flow structure in a pressure swirl hollow cone spray. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 2010; 49(1): 125-131. doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2009.12.003.

Hamid AHA, Atan R. Spray characteristics of jet–swirl nozzles for thrust chamber injector. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2009; 13(4-5): 192-196. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2008.10.003.

Sun Y, Alkhedhair A M, Guan Z, Hooman K. Numerical and experimental study on the spray characteristics of full-cone pressure swirl atomizers. Energy, 2018; 160: 678-692. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.060.

Hewitt A J. Spray drift: impact of requirements to protect the environment. Crop Protection, 2000; 19(8): 623-627. doi: 10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00082-X.

Hilz E, Vermeer A W P, Cohen Stuart M A, Leermakers F A M. Mechanism of perforation based on spreading properties of emulsified oils. Atomization and Sprays, 2012; 22(12): 1053-1075. doi: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.2013006728.

Makhnenko I, Alonzi E R, Fredericks S A, Colby C M, Dutcher C S. A review of liquid sheet breakup: Perspectives from agricultural sprays. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2021; 157: 105805. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105805.

Durdina L, Jedelsky J, Jicha M. Investigation and comparison of spray characteristics of pressure-swirl atomizers for a small-sized aircraft turbine engine. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2014; 78: 892-900. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.07.066.

Zhang T, Dong B, Chen X, Qiu Z, Jiang R, Li W. Spray characteristics of pressure-swirl nozzles at different nozzle diameters. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017; 121: 984-991. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.04.089.

Santolaya JL, Aísa L A, Calvo E, García I, Cerecedo L M. Experimental study of near-field flow structure in hollow cone pressure swirl sprays. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2007; 23(2): 382-389. doi:10.2514/1.20713.

Patel M K, Kundu M, Sahoo H K, Nayak M K. Enhanced performance of an air-assisted electrostatic nozzle: Role of electrode material and its dimensional considerations in spray charging. Engineering in Agriculture, Environment and Food, 2016; 9(4): 332-338. doi: 10.1016/j.eaef.2016.05.002.

Senecal P K, Schmidt D P, Nouar I, Rutland C J, Reitz R D, Corradini M L. Modeling high-speed viscous liquid sheet atomization. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1999; 25(6): 1073-1097. doi: 10.1016/S0301-9322(99)00057-9.

Saha A, Lee J D, Basu S, Kumar R. Breakup and coalescence characteristics of a hollow cone swirling spray. Physics of Fluids, 2012; 24(12): 124103. doi: 10.1063/1.4773065.

Davanlou A, Lee J D, Basu S, Kumar R. Effect of viscosity and surface tension on breakup and coalescence of bicomponent sprays. Chemical Engineering Science, 2015; 131: 243-255. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2015.03.057.

Song S R, Sun D Z, Xue X Y, Dai Q F, Li Z, Li Z, et al. Design of pipeline constant pressure spraying equipment and facility in mountainous region orangery. IFAC-Papersonline, 2018; 51(17): 495-502. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.161.

Walzel P. Spraying and atomizing of liquids. Ullmann's encyclopedia of industrial chemistry, 2000: 1-30. doi: 10.1002/14356007.b02_06.pub3.

Wilson C. Chin. Managed pressure drilling. Elsevier, 2012. doi: 10.1016/C2010-0-66595-3.

Lefebvre A H, McDonell V G. Atomization and sprays: CRC press; 2017. doi: 10.1201/9781315120911

Shrigondekar H, Chowdhury A, Prabhu S V. Characterization of solid-cone simplex mist nozzles. Fire Safety Journal, 2020; 111: 102936. doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2019.102936.

Bade K M, Schick R J. Phase Doppler Interferometry volume flux sensitivity to parametric settings and droplet trajectory. Atomization and sprays, 2011; 21(7): 537-51. doi: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.2012001407.

Datta A, Som S K. Numerical prediction of air core diameter, coefficient of discharge and spray cone angle of a swirl spray pressure nozzle. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2000; 21(4): 412-419. doi: 10.1016/S0142-727X(00)00003-5.

Dombrowski N, Hooper P C. The effect of ambient density on drop formation in sprays. Chemical Engineering Science, 1962; 17(4): 291-305. doi: 10.1016/0009-2509(62)85008-8.

Sivakumar D, Vankeswaram S K, Sakthikumar R, Raghunandan BN. Analysis on the atomization characteristics of aviation biofuel discharging from simplex swirl atomizer. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2015; 72: 88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2015.02.009.

Rezaei S, Vashahi F, Ryu G, Lee J. On the correlation of the primary breakup length with fuel temperature in pressure swirl nozzle. Fuel, 2019; 258: 116094. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116094.

Xia Y, Alshehhi M, Hardalupas Y, Khezzar L. Spray characteristics of free air-on-water impinging jets. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2018; 100: 86-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2017.12.007.




Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office