Key technologies of tomato-picking robots based on machine vision

Authors

  • Zirui Yin 1. State Key Laboratory of Precision Blasting, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430056, China 2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Blasting Engineering, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430056, China
  • Han Li 1. State Key Laboratory of Precision Blasting, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430056, China 2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Blasting Engineering, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430056, China
  • Zhijiang Zuo 1. State Key Laboratory of Precision Blasting, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430056, China 2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Blasting Engineering, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430056, China
  • Zhaoxin Guan 1. State Key Laboratory of Precision Blasting, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430056, China 2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Blasting Engineering, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430056, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25165/ijabe.v%25vi%25i.8954

Keywords:

tomato-picking robot, end effector, machine vision, deep learning, YOLO v8n

Abstract

To address the challenges of harsh harvesting environments, high labor intensity, and low picking efficiency in tomato harvesting, this study investigates the key technologies related to the end-effector design, detection and recognition, and spatial localization of tomato-picking robots. A non-contact cavity-type end-effector is designed, which effectively prevents tomato damage caused by compression during picking while preserving the peduncle. Additionally, the motion of the robotic arm is simulated for performance analysis. Subsequently, tomato images are captured and annotated for training deep neural network models. Both the original YOLO v8n and the improved YOLO v8n models are used for tomato image detection, with a focus on the impact of varying light intensities and different tomato maturities on recognition and localization accuracy. Experimental results demonstrate that the robot’s vision system achieves optimal recognition and localization performance under light intensities ranging from 20 000 to 30 000 lx, with an accuracy of 91.5%, an average image detection speed of 15.1 ms per image, and an absolute localization error of 1.55 cm. Furthermore, the prototype tomato-picking robot’s end-effector successfully performed stable grasping of individual tomatoes without damaging the skin, achieving a picking success rate of 83.3%, with an average picking time of approximately 9.5 s per fruit. This study provides a technical support for the automated harvesting of tomato-picking robots. Keywords: tomato-picking robot, end effector, machine vision, deep learning, YOLO v8n DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20251803.8954 Citation: Yin Z R, Li H, Zuo Z J, Guan Z X. Key technologies of tomato-picking robots based on machine vision. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2025; 18(3): 247–256.

References

Li J M, Xiang C Y, Wang X X, Guo Y M, Huang Z J. Current status and prospects of China’s tomato industry during the 13th Five-Year Plan. China Vegetables, 2021;(2): 13-20. (in Chinese)

Zhou M, Li C B. The current status and prospects of tomato seed industry in China. Vegetables, 2022;(5): 6-10. (in Chinese)

Hu H R, Zhang Y Y, Zhou J L, Chen Q, Wang J P. Research status of end effectors for fruit and vegetable harvesting robots. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 2024; 45(4): 231-236. (in Chinese)

Zhang P, Tang Q Y, Chen L F, Qin C L, Wang L Y. Research status and progress analysis of fruit and vegetable picking robots. Southern Agricultural Machinery, 2023; 54(7): 9-12.

Molaei F, Ghatrehsamani S. Kinematic-based multi-objective design optimization of a grapevine pruning robotic manipulator. AgriEngineering, 2022; 4(3): 606-625.

Moreira G, Magalhães S A, Pinho T, dos Santos F S, Cunha M. Benchmark of deep learning and a proposed HSV colour space models for the detection and classification of greenhouse tomato. Agronomy, 2022; 12(2): 356.

Huang C W, Cai D X, Wang W Z, Li J, Duan J L, Yang Z. Development of an automatic control system for a hydraulic pruning robot. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2023; 214: 108329.

Zhao Q, Li L J, Wu Z C, Guo X, Li J. Optimal design and experiment of manipulator for camellia pollen picking. Applied Sciences, 2022; 12(16): 8011.

Chen R. Application and development trends of mechanical automation technology in modern agriculture. Agricultural Engineering Technology, 2024; 44(2): 64-65. (in Chinese)

Li T H, Sun M, He Q H, Zhang G S, Shi G Y, Ding X M, et al. Tomato recognition and location algorithm based on improved YOLOv5. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2023; 208: 107759.

Kondo N, Yata K, Iida M, Shiigi T, Monta M, Kurita M, et al. Development of an end-effector for a tomato cluster harvesting robot. Engineering in Agriculture, Environment and Food, 2010; 3(1): 20-24.

Liu J Z, Peng Y, Faheem M. Experimental and theoretical analysis of fruit plucking patterns for robotic tomato harvesting. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2020; 173: 105330.

Liu J Z, Yuan Y, Gao Y, Tang S Q, Li Z G. Virtual model of grip-and-cut picking for simulation of vibration and falling of grape clusters. Transactions of the ASABE, 2019; 62(3): 603-614.

Yaguchi H, Nagahama K, Hasegawa T, Inaba M. Development of an autonomous tomato harvesting robot with rotational plucking gripper. In: 2016 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Daejeon, Korea (South): IEEE, 2016; pp.652-657.

Wang X N, Wu P H, Feng Q C, Wang G H. Design and experiments of tomato picking robot system. Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2016; 38(4): 94-98. (in Chinese)

Zheng X J, Rong J C, Zhang Z Q, Yang Y, Li W, Yuan T. Fruit growing direction recognition and nesting grasping strategies for tomato harvesting robots. Journal of Field Robotics, 2023; 41(2): 300-313.

Rong J C, Wang P B, Wang T J, Hu L, Yuan T. Fruit pose recognition and directional orderly grasping strategies for tomato harvesting robots. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2022; 202: 107430.

Fujinaga T, Yasukawa S, Ishii K. Development and evaluation of a tomato fruit suction cutting device. In: 2021 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII), Iwaki, Fukushima, Japan: IEEE, 2021; pp.628-633. doi: 10.1109/IEEECONF49454.2021.9382670.

Liang X F, Jin C Q, Ni M D, Wang Y W. Acquisition and experiment on location information of picking point of tomato fruit clusters. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018; 34(16): 163-169. (in Chinese)

Feng J H, Li Z W, Rong Y L, Sun Z L. Identification of mature tomatoes based on an algorithm of modified circular Hough transform. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Machinery and Chemistry, 2021; 42(4): 190-196. (in Chinese)

Li H, Tao H X, Cui L H, Liu D W, Sun J T, Zhang M. Tomato fruit recognition and localization method based on SOM-K-means algorithm. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2021; 52(1): 23-29. (in Chinese)

Wang J P, Xu G. Research on tomato maturity detection method based on machine vision and electronic nose fusion. Food and Machinery, 2022; 38(02): 148-152.

Benavides M, CantónGarbín M, SánchezMolina J A, Rodríguez F. Automatic tomato and peduncle location system based on computer vision for use in robotized harvesting. Applied Sciences, 2020; 10(17): 5887.

Fass E, Shlomi E, Ziv C, Glikman O, Helman D. Machine learning models based on hyperspectral imaging for pre-harvest tomato fruit quality monitoring. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2025; 229: 109788. doi: 10.1016/J.COMPAG.2024. 109788.

Bai Y H, Mao S H, Zhou J, Zhang B H. Clustered tomato detection and picking point location using machine learning-aided image analysis for automatic robotic harvesting. Precision Agriculture, 2023; 24(2): 727-743.

Rong J C, Zhou H, Zhang F, Yuan T, Wang P B. Tomato cluster detection and counting using improved YOLOv5 based on RGB-D fusion. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2023; 207: 107741.

Zhang R C, Zhou Y C, Hou Y H, Liu Z Y, Zhao H G, Zhao Y H. Counting tomatoes with different maturities using ultra-depth masking and improved YOLOv8. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2024; 40(24): 146-156. (in Chinese)

Wang X W, Liu J. Tomato anomalies detection in greenhouse scenarios based on YOLO-Dense. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021; 12: 634103.

Li T H, Sun M, Ding X M, Li Y H, Zhang G S, Shi G Y, et al. T Tomato recognition method at the ripening stage based on YOLO v4 and HSV. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2021; 37(21): 183-190. (in Chinese)

Wang X F, Wu Z W, Jia M, Xu T, Pan C L, Qi X B, et al. Lightweight SM-YOLOv5 tomato fruit detection algorithm for plant factory. Sensors, 2023; 23(6): 3336.

Cai Y Q, Cui B, Deng H, Zeng Z, Wang Q C, Lu D J, et al. Cherry tomato detection for harvesting using multimodal perception and an improved YOLOv7-tiny neural network. Agronomy, 2024; 14(10): 2320.

Miao R H, Li Z W, Wu J L. Lightweight cherry tomato maturity detection method based on improved YOLO v7. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 2023; 54(10): 225-233. (in Chinese)

Huang Y P, Liu Y, Yang Y T, Zhang Z W, Chen K J. Assessment of tomato color by spatially resolved and conventional vis NIR spectroscopies. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2019; 39(11): 3585-3591. (in Chinese).

Zhang Z L L, He T T, Li Z W, Shi K L, Liu C B, Zheng W G. Quantitative grading method for tomato maturity using regional brightness correction. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2023; 39(7): 195-204. doi: 10.11975/j.issn. 1002-6819.202211192. (in Chinese)

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Yin, Z., Li, H., Zuo, Z., & Guan, Z. (2025). Key technologies of tomato-picking robots based on machine vision. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 18(3), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.25165/ijabe.v%vi%i.8954

Issue

Section

Information Technology, Sensors and Control Systems