Optimal structural design of a sugarcane harvester extractor based on CFD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25165/ijabe.v18i4.9323Keywords:
sugarcane harvest, CFD, extractor, structural optimizationAbstract
To address the challenges of high impurity rate and cane loss rate in mechanized sugarcane harvesting, the internal flow field of the extractor was analyzed through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation, and the structure of the extractor was optimized to improve the harvesting quality. The simulation model was validated by comparing simulated and experimental wind speeds at the extractor outlet, yielding a maximum error of 5.29% and an average error of 4.71%, confirming the model’s accuracy. The analysis revealed that abrupt changes in structural geometry lead to significant airflow vortices within the discharge hood, a backflow phenomenon at the outlet, and additional vortices in the cleaning chamber, all of which ultimately result in high impurity rate and cane loss rate. To address these issues, the extractor’s structure was optimized, the outer contour of the discharge hood was designed as a smooth arc curve, and the lower air inlet of the cleaning chamber was changed from rectangular to circular, which eliminated the vortices and improved airflow uniformity. The impurity rate test showed that when the harvester driving speed was 1 km/h, the impurity rate level before and after optimization was comparable across different rotational speeds. At 2 km/h, the low-speed performance (1250 r/min) was significantly improved, reducing the impurity rate by 21.52%. At 3 km/h, the impurity rate decreased by 19.84% and 28.30% at low and medium speeds (1450 r/min), respectively. The cane loss rate test demonstrated that when the extractor speed was 1250 r/min, the difference before and after optimization was minimal. At 1450 r/min, the cane loss rate decreased significantly, with a maximum decrease of 10.75%. At 1650 r/min, the cane loss rate decreased by 8.78% at most. The optimized extractor significantly reduced the impurity rate and cane loss rate at higher harvester speeds (2-3 km/h), making it suitable for large-scale and high-speed harvesting operations and improving the harvesting efficiency. The research results will help to design and improve the performance of the extractor, thus improving the harvest quality and increasing farmers’ income. Keywords: sugarcane harvest, CFD, extractor, structural optimization DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20251804.9323 Citation: Zhou B C, Han J C, Wu Z J, Feng F, Ma S C. Optimal structural design of a sugarcane harvester extractor based on CFD. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2025; 18(4): 117–127.References
Zhao H, Sun D, Lu Y. Recent situation, hot spot analysis and prospect of sugarcane research in China. Sugarcane Sugar Ind., 2018; 20: 65–70. (in Chinese)
Zhou Y, Yang L, Bo M. Analysis of yield difference and its influencing factors in main sugarcane producing areas of China. China Agric. Sci., 2021; 54: 2377–2388. (in Chinese)
Wei Q, Yang B, Gao Z. Analysis on the present situation of sugarcane industrialization in China. Agric. Mech. Res., 2015; 37: 247–254. (in Chinese)
Zhang C, Lu H. Current situation and suggestions of mechanized sugarcane harvesting in Guangxi. Agric. Eng., 2019; 9: 5–9. (in Chinese)
Kishore N, Gayathri D, Venkatesh J. Present mechanization status in sugarcane: A review. Int. J. Agric. Sci., 2017; 9: 4247–4253. https://api. semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:268427724
Fan Q, Huang Q, Wu H. Overview and prospect of sugarcane harvesting mechanization at home and abroad. Sugarcane Sugar Ind., 2020; 49: 1–11. (in Chinese)
Liu Q T, Huang Y, Jiang J L. Review of sugarcane mechanized harvesting technology and equipment. Transactions of the CSAM, 2024; 55(12): 1–21. (in Chinese)
Huo P, Ma S C, Su C Y, Ding Z L, Li W Q, Qian J, et al. Sugarcane leaf-stalk separating technology: A critical review. Biosystems Engineering, 2023; 228: 120–148.
Whiteing C, Norris C P, Paton D C. Extraneous matter versus cane loss: Finding a balance in chopper harvested green cane. Sugar Cane Tech, 2001; 24(2): 276–282.
Sichter N J, Whiteing C, Bonaventura P. Estimation of harvester losses by determination of sugar in harvest residue. International Sugar Journal, 2006; 108(1288): 218–222
Viator R P, Richard E P, Viator B J. Sugarcane chopper harvester extractor and ground speed effects on yield and quality. Appl. Eng. Agric., 2007; 23(1): 31–34.
Wang F, Yang G, Ke W. Studies on suspension property of sugarcane components. IFAC-Papers On Line, 2018; 51(17): 526–531.
Huang Z, Sun F Y, Huang S X, Yang D T. Fluent simulation of inner-flowfield of axial-excluder devices for sugarcane harvester. J Agric Mechaniz Res, 2017; 39(3): 32–36. (in Chinese)
Nong H, Zeng B, Mo J. Simulation of internal flow field of sugarcane harvester impurity removal device based on SolidWorks flow simulation. Agric Eng, 2017; 4: 133–137. (in Chinese)
Zhou B C, Ma S C, Li W Q, Li W Z, Peng C. Study on the influence mechanism of energy consumption of sugarcane harvester extractor by fluid simulation and experiment. Agriculture, 2023; 13(9): 1726.
Xie F X, Ou Y G, Liu Q T, Zou X P, Feng J M. Design and test of exhaust extractor for sugarcane harvester. Transactions of the CSAE, 2012; 28(25): 8–14. (in Chinese)
Wang H, Li S, Ma E. Pneumatic design of impurity removal extractor for small sugarcane harvester. Agric Mechaniz Res, 2015; 37(10): 103–107. (in Chinese)
Xing H N, Ma S C, Mo J L, Zeng B S, Liang W P, Li W Q, et al. Optimization and experiment of parameters for the impeller structure of extractor in a sugarcane chopper harvester. Transactions of the CSAE, 2021; 37(12): 12–19. (in Chinese)
Xing H N, Ma S C, Wang F L, Bai J, Ma J. Aerodynamic performance evaluation of sugarcane harvester extractor based on CFD. Sugar Tech, 2021; 23: 627–633.
Xing H N, Ma S C, Wang F L, Bai J, Hu J. Improving the performance of a sugarcane harvester extractor using design changes validated by computational fluid dynamic modelling and experiment. Biosystems Engineering, 2022; 218: 124–138.
Ren J, Wu T, Liu Q, Zou X, Li K. Design and test of the structure of extractor negative pressure zone of sugarcane chopper harvester. Agronomy, 2022; 12(10): 2336.
Wang C, Ning X, Wang C. Cross-flow extractor with double-channel herringbone inclined impeller of combine harvester. Transactions of the CSAM, 2013; 44(2): 17–21. (in Chinese)
Gebrehiwot M G, Baer J D, Baelmans M. Effect of a cross-flow opening on the performance of a centrifugal extractor in a combine harvester: Computational and experimental study. Biosystems Engineering, 2010; 105(2): 247–256.
Tong S, Shen Q, Tang N, Jia Y, Cong F, Gu W. Numerical simulation and optimization test of mixed flow field in longitudinal axial flow cleaning device. Transactions of the CSAM, 2016; 47(7): 135–142. (in Chinese)
Zhang S. Principles and Applications of CFD Technology. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press, 2016. (in Chinese)
Xu H Y, Guo J H. Direct numerical simulation analysis of turbulence in square and rectangular annular tubes: II. Reynolds stress field and mean energy spectrum, a re-conceptualization of the traditional turbulence ontology relationship. Sci China Phys Mech Astron, 2017; 47(8): 113–129. (in Chinese)
Wu S, Zhang J. Determination of inlet conditions in direct simulation of turbulent premixed jet flames. J Tsinghua Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2014; 54(6): 834–838. (in Chinese)
Su Y, Splitter D, Kim S H. Laminar-to-turbulent flame transition and cycleto-cycle variations in large eddy simulation of spark-ignition engines. Int J Engine Res, 2021; 22(9): 2803–2818.
Farges B, Gauffre M C, Benhamadouche S, Badel P, Faucher V, Ricciardi G. Advanced benchmark of the flow through a mixing vane grid—Large eddy simulation validation. Nucl Eng Des, 2021; 381: 1113335.
National Development and Reform Commission of the People’s Republic of China. JB/T 6275-2019. Test methods for sugarcane harvesting machinery. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2019. (in Chinese)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
IJABE is an international peer reviewed open access journal, adopting Creative Commons Copyright Notices as follows.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).