Sex identification in Procambarus clarkii using multi-dimensional feature fusion and enhancement

Authors

  • Lu Liu 1. School of Computer and Artificial Intelligence, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, Shandong, China;
  • Hanyu Zhang 2. College of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China;
  • Jun Yue 1. School of Computer and Artificial Intelligence, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, Shandong, China;
  • Guangjie Kou 1. School of Computer and Artificial Intelligence, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, Shandong, China;
  • Zhenbo Li 2. College of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China;
  • Longchuan Zhuang 3. Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai 264003, China

Abstract

Accurate sex identification in Procambarus clarkii is essential for genetic breeding and aquaculture management, as it helps optimize population structure, improve reproductive efficiency, and support sustainable aquaculture development. However, manual identification is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and prone to errors, especially when subtle visual differences need to be distinguished. To address this problem, this study proposed SCM-DETR, a sex identification method for Procambarus clarkii based on multi-dimensional feature fusion and enhancement. A high-resolution imaging system was used to acquire two-dimensional images of Procambarus clarkii, and a labeled dataset, the Procambarus clarkii gonad dataset (PGD), was constructed. To improve identification performance, a multi-dimensional semantics and details fusion method (MSDM) was designed to integrate high-level semantic information with fine-grained detail features, thereby enhancing feature representation and localization accuracy. In addition, a channel-spatial focus network (CSFN) was introduced to capture discriminative multidimensional features, including texture and color, for more accurate identification of subtle sex-related differences. Experimental results showed that SCM-DETR-R18 achieved 95.8% mAP@0.50 and 64.6% mAP@0.50-0.95 on the PGD, improving by 1.9 and 1.1 percentage points over the baseline model, respectively. The AP values of female and male gonads reached 93.3% and 96.5%, with gains of 3.3 and 1.9 percentage points, respectively. Moreover, the proposed model had the lowest parameter count (21.11 M) among all compared methods. The results of this study demonstrate that SCM-DETR can effectively improve automated sex identification in Procambarus clarkii and has good potential for intelligent aquaculture applications.      

Keywords: Procambarus clarkii, sex identification, detection transformer, multi-dimensional feature fusion, small target detection

DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20261903.10182

Citation: Liu L, Zhang H Y, Yue J, Kou G J, Li Z B, Zhuang L C. Sex identification in Procambarus clarkii using multi-dimensional feature fusion and enhancement. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2026; 19(3): 139–148.

References

[1] Campana S E. Accuracy, precision and quality control in age determination, including a review of the use and abuse of age validation methods. Journal of Fish Biology, 2001; 59（2）: 197–242.

[2] Hutchinson C E, TenBrink T T. Age determination of the Yellow Irish Lord: Management implications as a result of new estimates of maximum age. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 2011; 31（6）: 1116–1122.

[3] Han G F, Liu Y J, Cai J W, Duan E Z, Shi Z F, Zhao S D, et al. Deep learning-based gender recognition in Cherry Valley ducks through sound analysis. Animals, 2024; 14. doi: 10.3390/ani14203017.

[4] Nontunha N, Tinikul R, Chaiyamoon A, Vetkama W, Thongbuakaew T, Chaichotranunt S, et al. The effects of prostaglandin E2 on gonadal development and germ cell proliferation, and its presence during the gonadal cycle in the sea cucumber, Holothuria scabra. Aquaculture, 2022; 555: 738201.

[5] Lang N, Snæbjarnarson V, Cole E, Aodha O M, Igel C, Belogine S, et al. From coarse to fine-grained open-set recognition. In: 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition （CVPR）, 2024; pp.17804–17814. doi: 10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01686.

[6] Zhang S, Chi C, Yao Y, Lei Z, Li S Z. Bridging the gap between anchor-based and anchor-free detection via adaptive training sample selection. In: 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition （CVPR）, Seattle: IEEE, 2020; pp.9756–9765. doi: 10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00978.

[7] Wang Y, Li X, Weng S, Zhang G, Yue H, Feng H, et al. KD-DETR: Knowledge distillation for detection transformer with consistent distillation points sampling. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition （CVPR）. 2024; pp.16016–16025.

[8] Xing B W, Sun M, Liu Z C, Guan L W, Han J T, Yan C X, et al. Sonar fish school detection and counting method based on improved YOLOv8 and BoT-SORT. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2024; 12（6）: 964.

[9] Li Y J, Hu Z Y, Tu W, Zhang P, Wei S X, Yu H, et al. Dense fish population counting detection based on improved YOLOv7. Journal of Guangdong Ocean University, 2024; 44（2）: 115–123. （in Chinese）

[10] Geng C X, Wang A M, Yan T Y, Yu A N, Zhang H X, Zhang W X, et al. A Procambarus clarkii morphological feature recognition algorithm based on improved YOLOv8n loss function. Fishery Modernization, 2024; 51（5）: 72–80. （in Chinese）

[11] Chen Y F, Yue J, Li Z B, Yang J M, Wang W J. Pacific oyster gonad identification and grayscale calculation based on unapparent object detection. In: Liu Q, et al. （Ed.）. Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision （PRCV 2023）, 2023; 14436: 94–106.

[12] Carion N, Massa F, Synnaeve G, Usunier N, Kirillov A, Zagoruyko S. End-to-end object detection with transformers. In: Computer Vision – ECCV 2020, 2020; 12346: 213–229.

[13] Hou X Q, Liu M Q, Zhang S L, Wei P, Chen B D. Salience DETR: Enhancing detection transformer with hierarchical salience filtering refinement. 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference Computer Vision Pattern Recognition （CVPR）, Seattle: IEEE, 2024; pp.17574–17583. doi: 10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01664.

[14] Zhao Y A, Lv W Y, Xu S L, Wei J M, Wang G Z, Dang Q Q. DETRs beat YOLOs on real-time object detection. In: 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition （CVPR）, Seattle: IEEE, 2024; pp.16965–16974. doi: 10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01605.

[15] Li Y X, Hou Q B, Zheng Z H, Cheng M M, Yang J, Li X. Large selective kernel network for remote sensing object detection. 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision （ICCV）, Paris: IEEE, 2023; pp.16748–16759. doi: 10.1109/ICCV51070.2023.01540.

[16] Zhu X Z, Su W J, Lu L W, Li B, Wang X G, Dai J F. Deformable DETR: Deformable transformers for end-to-end object detection. arXiv preprint, 2020; arXiv: 2010.04159.

[17] Meng D P, Chen X K, Fan Z J, Zeng G, Li H Q, Yuan Y H. Conditional DETR for fast training convergence. In: 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision （ICCV）, Montreal: IEEE, 2021; pp.3651–3660. doi: 10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00363.

[18] Liu S, Li F, Zhang H, Yang X, Qi X B, Su H, et al. DAB-DETR: Dynamic anchor boxes are better queries for DETR. arXiv preprint, 2022; arXiv: 2201.12329.

[19] Wang Y, Zhang Y, Jiang Y, Yuan L. DQ-DETR: Dual query detection transformer for phrase extraction and grounding. Proc Eur Conf Comput Vis （ECCV）, 2024.

[20] Jia D, Yuan Y H, He H D, Wu X P, Yu H J, Lin W H. DETRs with hybrid matching. In: 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition （CVPR）, Vancouver: IEEE, 2023; pp.19702–19712. doi: 10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.01887.

[21] Chen Q, Chen X K, Wang J, Zhang S, Yao K, Feng H C. Group DETR: Fast DETR training with group-wise one-to-many assignment. In: 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision （ICCV）, Paris: IEEE, 2023; pp.6610–6619. doi: 10.1109/ICCV51070.2023.00610.

[22] Zhang H X, Zhang B, Liu K, Gan Z X, Zhu G N. UAV-DETR: Efficient end-to-end object detection for unmanned aerial vehicle imagery. 2025 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligence Robots and Systems （IROS）, 2025; pp.15143-15149. doi: 10.1109/IROS60139.2025.11246176.

[23] Zhang Y X, Hu Z Y, Liu J H, Li Y J, Lin J J, Wang Y, et al. PUFFER-DETR: Tiger puffer similar abnormal behavior recognition based on transformer. Aquacultural Engineering, 2025; 111: 102552.

[24] Yang H Y, Wang J, Bo Y M, Wang J C. ISTD-DETR: A deep learning algorithm based on DETR and super-resolution for infrared small target detection. Neurocomputing, 2025; 621: 129289.

[25] Huang Y X, Liu H I, Shuai H H, Cheng W H. DQ-DETR: DETR with dynamic query for tiny object detection. In: Leonardis A, Ricci E, Roth S, Russakovsky O, Sattler T, Varol G. （Ed.） In: Computer Vision – ECCV 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2024; 15134: 290–305.

[26] Girshick R. Fast R-CNN. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision （ICCV）, Santiago: IEEE, 2015; pp.1440–1448. doi: 10.1109/ICCV.2015.169.

[27] Li H L, Li J, Wei H B, Liu Z, Zhan Z F, Ren Q L. Slim-neck by GSConv: A lightweight design for real-time detector architectures. Journal of Real-Time Image Process, 2024; 21（3）: 62.

[28] Kang M, Ting C M, Ting F F, Phan R C W, et al. ASF-YOLO: A novel YOLO model with attentional scale sequence fusion for cell instance segmentation. Image and Vision Computing, 2024; 141: 105057.

[29] Konopczynski T, Heiman R, Woźnicki P, Gniewek P, Duvernoy M-C, Hallatscheck O, et al. Instance segmentation of densely packed cells using a hybrid model of U-Net and Mask R-CNN. In: Rutkowski L, Scherer R, Korytkowski M, Pedrycz W, Tadeusiewicz R, Zurada J M, et al. （Ed.） Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing （ICAISC 2020）, Part I, 2020; pp.626–635. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-61401-0_58.

[30] Wang J, Zhang Z T, Wu M H, Ye Y G, Wang S, Cao Y, et al. Improved BlendMask: Nuclei instance segmentation for medical microscopy images. IET Image Process, 2023; 110（10）: 2284–2296.

[31] Zhao L J, Jia Y F, Yin W K, Li Z H, Liu C D, Luo H, et al. Recognition and localization method of maize weeding robot based on improved YOLOv5. Int J Agric Biol Eng, 2025; 18（2）: 248–258.

[32] Varghese R, Sambath M. YOLOv8: A novel object detection algorithm with enhanced performance and robustness. In: 2024 International Conference on Advances in Data Engineering and Intelligent Computing Systems （ADICS）, Chennai: IEEE, 2024; pp.1–6. doi: 10.1109/ADICS58448.2024.10533619.

[33] Wang C Y, Yeh I H, Liao H Y M. YOLOv9: Learning what you want to learn using programmable gradient information. In: Computer Vision - ECCV 2024, 2024; pp.1–21. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-72751-1_1.

[34] Liu R. YOLOv10 tomato ripening detection enhanced by convolutional neural network attention mechanism. In: 2024 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Blockchain （CCSB）, Shenzhen: IEEE, 2024; pp.90–93. doi: 10.1109/CCSB63463.2024.10735542.

[35] Song Q, Liu S W, Dai K H, Bai K. YOLOv11-DEC: An improved YOLOv11 model for UAV detection in complex contexts. In: 2025 28th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design （CSCWD）, Compiegne: IEEE, 2025; pp.2404–2409. doi: 10.1109/CSCWD64889.2025.11033339.

[36] Carion N, Massa F, Synnaeve G, Usunier N, Kirillov A, Zagoruyko S. End-to-end object detection with transformers. In: Computer Vision – ECCV 2020, 2020; pp.213–229. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-58452-8_13.

[37] Zhu X Z, Su W J, Lu L W, Li B, Wang X G, Dai J F. Deformable DETR: Deformable transformers for end-to-end object detection. arXiv preprint, 2020; arXiv: 2010.04159, 2020.

[38] Zhang H, Li F, Liu S L, Zhang L, Su H, Zhu J, et al. DINO: DETR with improved denoising anchor boxes for end-to-end object detection. arXiv preprint, arXiv: 2203.03605, 2022.

[39] Cao Y R, He Z J, Wang L J, Wang W G, Yuan Y X, Zhang D W. VisDrone-DET2021: The vision meets drone object detection challenge results. In: 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops （ICCVW）, Montreal: IEEE, 2021; pp.2847–2854. doi: 10.1109/ICCVW54120.2021.00319.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-14

How to Cite

(1)
Liu, L.; Zhang, H.; Yue, J.; Kou, G.; Li, Z.; Zhuang, L. Sex Identification in Procambarus Clarkii Using Multi-Dimensional Feature Fusion and Enhancement. Int J Agric & Biol Eng 2026, 19, 139–148.

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 3 (2026): IJABE

Section

Animal, Plant and Facility Systems

License

Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

IJABE is an international peer reviewed, open access journal, adopting Creative Commons Copyright Notices as follows.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).