Precision airflow optimization in air-assisted orchard sprayers to reduce drift and improve coverage
Design and Performance Analysis of an Optimized Airflow System
Keywords:
airflow configuration, orchard sprayer, drift, canopy densityAbstract
The effectiveness of air-assisted orchard spraying depends on matching airflow to canopy structure, since improper airflow reduces coverage and increases spray drift. However, the optimal airflow conditions that balance coverage and drift remain unclear. A hydraulically driven axial-fan orchard sprayer capable of continuously adjusting airflow was developed, and different airflow levels were generated by regulating fan speed through a proportional valve operated at different voltage levels. Air velocities generated at different voltage levels were first quantified under laboratory conditions and subsequently validated in a pecan orchard by measuring canopy-exit air velocity under airflow-only conditions. Finally, spray applications were performed at a constant application volume while varying air velocity, and coverage and drift (ground and airborne) were evaluated using water-sensitive papers (WSP). At 4.50 V (air velocity: 21 m/s), the spray index (Io) was close to zero and positive, indicating the optimal operating condition. Under these conditions, coverage reached 35.94% on water-sensitive papers in the middle canopy. Furthermore, ground drift was 18.15% at the closest point to the tree, whereas airborne drift was 13.58% at a height of 3 m. Appropriate adjustment of airflow directed to the canopy improved leaf surface coverage while reducing both ground and airborne spray drift. At the operating condition that resulted in the lowest overall drift and the most effective spray coverage (4.5 V, 460 r/min), fuel consumption decreased to 6.24 L/h, compared with 7.76 L/h under the conventional operating condition (5.0 V, 540 r/min). This study provides a practical methodology for determining airflow levels that balance spray coverage, drift reduction, and fuel consumption in orchard spraying applications.
Key words: airflow configuration; orchard sprayer; drift; canopy density
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20261904.10629
Citation: İtmeç M. Precision airflow optimization in air-assisted orchard sprayers to reduce drift and improve coverage. Int JAgric & Biol Eng, 2026; 19(4): 34–42.
References
[1] Wang G Q, Li Z Y, Jia W D, Ou M X, Dong X, Zhang Z J. A review on the evolution of air assisted spraying in orchards and the associated leaf motion during spraying. Agriculture, 2025; 15（9）: 964.
[2] Wang Y F, Jia W D, Ou M X, Wang X J, Dong X. A review of orchard canopy perception technologies for variable-rate spraying. Sensors, 2025; 25（16）: 4898.
[3] Garcera C, Fonte A, Molto E, Chueca P. Sustainable use of pesticide applications in citrus: A support tool for volume rate adjustment. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2017; 14（7）: 715.
[4] Escolà A, Rosell-Polo J R, Planas S, Gil E, Pomar J, Camp F, et al. Variable rate sprayer. Part 1 - Orchard prototype: Design, implementation and validation. Comput Electron Agric, 2013; 95: 122–135.
[5] Larbi P, Salyani M. Model to predict spray deposition in citrus airblast sprayer applications: Part 1: Spray dispersion. Transactions of the ASABE, 2012; 55: 29–39.
[6] Koizumi A, Shimizu M, Sasaki Y, Hirai T. In situ drag coefficient measurements for rooftop trees. J Wood Sci., 2016; 62: 363–369.
[7] Manickathan L, Defraeye T, Allegrini J, Derome D, Carmeliet J. Comparative study of flow field and drag coefficient of model and small natural trees in a wind tunnel. Urban For Urban Green, 2018; 35: 230–239.
[8] Salcedo R, Pons P, Llop J, Zaragoza T, Campos J, Ortega P, et al. Dynamic evaluation of airflow stream generated by a reverse system of an axial fan sprayer using 3D-ultrasonic anemometers: Effect of canopy structure. Comput Electron Agric, 2019; 163: 104851.
[9] Bekkers C C A, Angelou N, Dellwik E. Drag coefficient and frontal area of a solitary mature tree. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2022; 220: 104854.
[10] Marucco P, Tamagnone M, Balsari P. Study of air velocity adjustment to maximise spray deposition in peach orchard. Agric Eng Int CIGR J, 2008; 10（8）: 006.
[11] Triloff P, Knoll M, Lind K, Herbst E, Kleisinger S. Low-loss spray application - The scientific basis. Julius-Kühn-Archiv, 2013; 439: 127–134.
[12] Miranda-Fuentes A, Rodríguez-Lizana A, Cuenca A, Gonzalez-Sanchez E J, Blanco-Roldan G L, Gil-Ribes J A. Improving plant protection product applications in traditional and intensive olive orchards through the development of new prototype air-assisted sprayers. Crop Prot., 2017; 94: 44–58.
[13] Pai N, Salyani M, Sweeb R D. Regulating airflow of orchard airblast sprayer based on tree foliage density. Transactions of the ASABE, 2009; 52: 1423–1428.
[14] Khot L R, Ehsani R, Albrigo G, Larbi P, Landers A, Campoy A, et al. Air assisted sprayer adapted for precision horticulture: Spray patterns and deposition assessments in small-sized citrus canopies. Biosyst Eng., 2012; 113: 76–85.
[15] Gu J, Zhu H, Ding W. Air velocity distributions inside tree canopies from a variable-rate air-assisted sprayer. In: 2013 ASABE Annual International Meeting. St. Joseph, MI: ASABE, 2013. DOI: 10.13031/aim.20131594711.
[16] Petrovic D, Banaj D, Banaj A, Barac Z, Vidakovic I, Tadic V. The impact of conventional and sensor spraying on drift and deposit in cherry orchard. Teh Vjesn, 2019; 26（5）. DOI: 10.17559/tv-20171206133147
[17] Larbi P A, Culumber M, Thistle H W, Willette M J. Downwind drift from almond airblast spray applications: Field measurement to aid mechanistic model development. Pest Manag Sci, 2025; 81: 3811–3821.
[18] Duga A T, Ruysen K, Dekeyser D, Nuyttens D, Bylemans D, Nicolai B M, et al. Spray deposition profiles in pome fruit trees: Effects of sprayer design, training system and tree canopy characteristics. Crop Prot, 2015; 67: 200–213.
[19] Grella M, Gioelli F, Marucco P, Zwertvaegher I, Mozzanini E, Mylonas N, et al. Field assessment of a pulse width modulation spray system applying different spray volumes: Duty cycle and forward speed effects on vines spray coverage. Precis Agric, 2022; 23: 219–252.
[20] Mahmud M S, Zahid A, He L, Zhu H, Choi D, Krawczyk G, et al. Development of an automatic airflow control system for precision sprayers based on tree canopy density. Transactions of the ASABE, 2022; 65: 1225–1240.
[21] Salas B, Salcedo R, Ortega P, Grella M, Gil E. Use of ultrasound anemometers to study the influence of air currents generated by a sprayer with an electronic control airflow system on foliar coverage: Effect of droplet size. Comput Electron Agric, 2022; 202: 107381.
[22] Grella M, Marucco P, Mozzanini E, Athanasakos L, Biglia A, Comba L, et al. Effects of canopy density-based airblast fan airflow adjustment on vines spray deposit. In: Precision Agriculture’23: 14th European Conference on Precision Agriculture. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2023. DOI: 10.3920/978-90-8686-947-3_14.
[23] Feng F, Zhang Y L, Wang Z C, Dou H J, Liu Y L, Zhong Y, et al. Experimental study on the airflow field distribution characteristics of a multi-outlet air-assisted orchard sprayer with variable inlet area. Agronomy, 2026; 16（4）: 450.
[24] Li T, Qi P, Wang Z, Xu S, Huang Z, Han L, et al. Evaluation of the effects of airflow distribution patterns on deposit coverage and spray penetration in multi-unit air-assisted sprayer. Agronomy, 2022; 12（4）: 944.
[25] Liu S H, Huang R F, Chen L J. Performance and inter-blade flow of axial flow fans with different blade angles of attack. J Chin Inst Eng, 2011; 34: 141–153.
[26] İtmeç M, Bayat A. A real-time variable rate air and liquid sprayer for orchard applications. Precis Agric, 2026; 27: 29.
[27] İtmeç M. Determination of droplet size characteristics of locally manufactured nozzles for knapsack sprayers. Selcuk J Agric Food Sci, 2026; 40（1）: 181–189.
[28] Salcedo R, Fonte A, Grella M, Garcerá C, Chueca P. Blade pitch and air-outlet width effects on the airflow generated by an airblast sprayer with wireless remote-controlled axial fan. Comput Electron Agric, 2021; 190: 106428. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106428.
[29] Zhu H, Zondag R H, Derksen R, Reding C, Krause M. Influence of spray volume on spray deposition and coverage within nursery trees. J Environ Hortic, 2008; 26: 51–57.
[30] Chen Y, Ozkan H E, Zhu Z, Derksen R, Krause C. Spray deposition inside tree canopies from a newly developed variable-rate air-assisted sprayer. Transactions of the ASABE, 2013; 56: 1263–1272.
[31] Cross J V, Walklate P J, Murray R A, Richardson G M. Spray deposits and losses in different sized apple trees from an axial fan orchard sprayer: Effects of spray liquid flow rate. Crop Prot, 2001; 20: 13–30.
[32] Salyani M, Farooq M, Sweeb R D. Spray deposition and mass balance in citrus orchard applications. Transactions of the ASABE, 2007; 50: 1963–1969.
[33] Endalew A M, Debaer C, Rutten N, Vercammen J, Delele M A, Ramon H, et al. A new integrated CFD modelling approach towards air-assisted orchard spraying—Part II: Validation for different sprayer types. Comput Electron Agric, 2010; 71: 137–147.
[34] İtmeç M, Bayat A, Özlüoymak Ö B, Soysal A. Sustainability analysis of various air-assisted orchard sprayer fan designs: Performance, energy and carbon footprint. Int J Agric Biol Eng, 2024; 17: 32–37.
[35] Salcedo R, Garcera C, Granell R, Molto E, Chueca P. Description of the airflow produced by an air-assisted sprayer during pesticide applications to citrus. Span J Agric Res., 2015; 13. DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2015132-6567.
[36] Vigo-Morancho A, Videgain M, Serreta A, Boné A, Vidal M, García-Ramos F J. Air-assisted sprayer airflow interaction with traditional olive orchard canopies and its effect on spray distribution. Comput Electron Agric, 2026; 246: 111587.
[37] Sidahmed M M, Brown R B. Simulation of spray dispersal and deposition from a forestry air-blast sprayer - Part I: Air jet model. Transactions of the ASAE, 2001; 44: 5–10.
[38] Zhang C, Zhou H, Fang S, Cao B. Investigation of airflow attenuation in orchard air-assisted spraying based on crown characteristics. Agriculture, 2026; 16（1）: 7.
[39] Shi R, Sun H, Qiu W, Lv X, Ahmad F, Gu J, et al. Analysing airflow velocity in the canopy to improve droplet deposition for air-assisted spraying: A case study on pears. Agronomy, 2022; 12（10）: 2424.
[40] Fessler L, Fulcher A, Lockwood D, Wright W, Zhu H. Advancing sustainability in tree crop pest management: Refining spray application rate with a laser-guided variable-rate sprayer in apple orchards. HortScience, 2020; 55: 1522–1530.
[41] Balsari P, Marucco P, Oggero G, Tamagnone M. Study of optimal air velocities for pesticide application in vineyard. Aspects App. Biol, 2008; 84: 417–423.
[42] Doruchowski G, Świechowski W, Hołownicki R, Godyń A, Bartosik A. Effect of airflow settings of an orchard sprayer with two individually controlled fans on spray deposition in apple trees and off-target drift. Agriculture, 2025; 15（23）: 2520. DOİ: 10.3390/agriculture15232520.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
IJABE is an international peer reviewed, open access journal, adopting Creative Commons Copyright Notices as follows.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
