Evaluating effective swath width and droplet distribution of aerial spraying systems on M-18B and Thrush 510G airplanes

Dongyan Zhang, Liping Chen, Ruirui Zhang, Wesley Clint Hoffmann, Gang Xu, Yubin Lan, Xiu Wang, Min Xu

Abstract


Aerial spraying plays an important role in promoting agricultural production and protecting the biological environment due to its flexibility, high effectiveness, and large operational area per unit of time. In order to evaluate the performance parameters of the spraying systems on two fixed wing airplanes M-18B and Thrush 510G, the effective swath width and uniformity of droplet deposition under headwind flight were tested while the planes operated at the altitudes of 5 m and 4 m. The results showed that although wind velocities varied from 0.9 m/s to 4.6 m/s, and the directions of the atomizer switched upward and downward in eight flights, the effective swath widths were kept approximately at 27 m and 15 m for the M-18B and Thrush 510G, respectively, and the latter was more stable. In addition, through analyzing the coefficients of variation (CVs) of droplet distribution, it was found that the CVs of the M-18B were 39.57%, 33.54%, 47.95%, and 59.04% at wind velocities of 0.9, 1.1, 1.4 and 4.6 m/s, respectively, gradually enhancing with the increasing of wind speed; the CVs of Thrush 510G were 79.12%, 46.19%, 14.90%, and 48.69% at wind velocities of 1.3, 2.3, 3.0 and 3.4 m/s, respectively, which displayed the irregularity maybe due to change of instantaneous wind direction. Moreover, in terms of the CVs and features of droplet distribution uniformity for both airplanes in the spray swath, choosing smaller CV (20%-45%) as the standard of estimation, it was found that the Thrush 510G had a better uniform droplet distribution than the M-18B. The results provide a research foundation for promoting the development of aerial spraying in China.
Keywords: aerial spraying, effective swath width, droplet distribution, coefficients of variation, agricultural airplane
DOI: 10.3965/j.ijabe.20150802.1493

Keywords


aerial spraying, effective swath width, droplet distribution, coefficients of variation, agricultural airplane

Full Text:

PDF

References


Zhou Z Y, Zang Y, Luo X W, Lan Y B, Xue X Y. Technology innovation development strategy on agricultural aviation industry for plant protection in China. Transactions of the CSAE, 2013; 29(24): 1–10. (in Chinese with English abstract)

Zhai C Y, Zhao C J, Wang X, Li W, Li W, Zhu R X. Nozzle test system for droplet deposition characteristics of orchard air-assisted sprayer and its application. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2014; 7(2): 122–129. doi: 10.3965/j.ijabe.20140702. 015.

David P, Rajinder P. Integrated Pest Management: Pesticide Problems. Springer, 2014; 3: 1–46.

Zhang D Y, Lan Y B, Chen L P, Wang X, Liang D. Current status and future trends of agricultural aerial spraying technology in China. Transactions of the CSAM, 2014; 45(10): 53–59. (in Chinese with English abstract)

Huang Y, Thomson S J. Spray deposition and drift characteristics of a low drift nozzle for aerial application at different application altitudes. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers annual international meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, June 20–23, 2010; 1: 413–421.

Zhu C Y, Wang B X. Development and discussion of aerial spray technology in plant protection. Plant Protection, 2014; 40(5): 1–7. (in Chinese with English abstract)

Fritz B K, Hoffmann W C, Bagley W E, Hewitt A. Field Scale Evaluation of Spray Drift Reduction Technologies from Ground and Aerial Application Systems. Journal of ASTM International, 2011; 8(5):1-11. DOI: 10.1520/JAI103457.

Fritz B K, Hoffmann W C, Wolf R E, Bretthauer S, Bagley W E. Wind Tunnel and Field Evaluation of Drift from Aerial Spray Applications with Multiple Spray Formulations. Journal of ASTM International, 2013; STP1558-EB, 1-18. DOI: 10-1520/STP104403.

Alan M. Deposition and swath testing of the Thrush G510P. http://agairupdate.com/article_detail.php?_kp_serial=00001068. 2012

Hoffmann W C, Tom H H. Effects of lowering spray boom in flight on swath width and drift. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 2000; 16(3): 217–220.

Zhang J, He X K, Song J L, Zeng A J, Liu Y J. Influence of spraying parameters of unmanned aircraft on droplets deposition. Transactions of the CSAE, 2012; 43(12): 94–96. (in Chinese with English abstract)

Xue X Y, Qin W C, Zhu S, Zhang S C, Zhou L X, Wu P. Effects of N-3 UAV spraying methods on the efficiency of insecticides against planthoppers and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica, 2013; 40(3): 273–278. (in Chinese with English abstract)

Xue X Y, Tu K, Qin W C, Lan Y B, Zhang H H. Drift and deposition of ultra-low altitude and low volume application in paddy field. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2014; 7(4): 23–28. DOI: 10.3965/ j.ijabe. 20140704.003.

Ru Y, Zhou H P, Jia Z C, Wu X W, Fan Q N. Design and application of electrostatic spraying system. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University: Natural Sciences Edition, 2011; 35(1): 91–94. (in Chinese with English abstract)

Zhou H P, Ru Y, Shu C R, Jia Z C. Improvement and experiment of aerial electrostatic spray device. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2012; 28(12): 7–12. (in Chinese with English abstract)

Guo Q C. Current status and development of Beidahuang General Aviation Airline. Seminar of agricultural aviation technology in China. Jiamusi, Heilongjiang Province, China, 2013.

Hoffmann W Clint. Operation and setup of aerial application equipment. Seminar of agricultural aviation technology in China. Jiamusi, Heilongjiang Province, China, 2013.

ASAE Standards, (2009) S386.2: Calibration and distribution pattern testing of agricultural aerial application equipment, St. Joseph, Mich.: ASAE.

MH/T Standards, (2011) 1040-2011: Determining application rates and distribution patterns from aerial application equipment, Beijing: MHT.

Smith D B, Bode L E, Gerard P D. Predicting ground boom spray drift. Transactions of the ASAE, 2000; 43(3): 547–553.

Thomson S J, Young L D, Bright J R, Foster P N, Poythress D D. Effects of spray release height and nozzle/atomizer configuration on penetration of spray in a soybean canopy – preliminary results. National Agricultural Aviation Association, Washington, DC. 2007.

Teske M E, Barry J W. Parametric sensitivity in aerial application. Transactions of the ASAE, 1993; 36(1): 27–33.

Wolf R E, Bretthauer D S, Gardisser R. Determining the effect of flat-fan nozzle angle on aerial spray droplet spectra. ASAE Paper No. AA05-003. St. Joseph, Mich. 2005.




Copyright (c)



2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office