Impact of global climate change on stream low flows: A case study of the great Miami river watershed, Ohio, USA

Sabin Shrestha, Suresh Sharma, Rishabh Gupta, Rabin Bhattarai

Abstract


Climate change will profoundly affect hydrological processes at various temporal and spatial scales. This study is focused on assessing the alteration of water resources availability and low flows frequencies driven by changing climates in different time periods of the 21st century. This study evaluates the adaptability of prevailing Global Circulation Models (GCMs) on a particular watershed through streamflow regimes. This analysis was conducted in the Great Miami River Watershed, Ohio by analyzing historical and future simulated streamflow using 10 climate model outputs and the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). The climate change scenarios, consisting of ten downscaled Coupled Model Intercomparision Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) climate models in combination with two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5) were selected based on the correlation between observed records and model outputs. Streamflow for three future periods, 2016-2043, 2044-2071 and 2072-2099, were independently analyzed and compared with the baseline period (1988-2015). Results from the average of ten models projected that 7-day low flows in the watershed would increase by 19% in the 21st century under both RCPs. This trend was also consistent for both hydrological (7Q10, 1Q10) and biological low flow statistics (4B3, 1B3). Similarly, average annual flow and monthly flows would also increase in future periods, especially in the summer. The flows simulated by SWAT in response to the majority of climate model projections showed a consistent increase in low flow patterns. However, the flow estimates using the Max-Planck-Institute Earth System Model (MPI-ESM-LR) climate output resulted in the biological based low flows (4B3, 1B3) decreasing by 22.5% and 33.4% under RCP 4.5 and 56.9% and 63.7% under RCP 8.5, respectively, in the future when compared to the baseline period. Regardless, the low flow ensemble from the 10 climate models for the 21st century seemed to be slightly higher than that of historical low flows.
Keywords: climate change, low flows, SWAT, climate models, Great Miami River Watershed
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20191201.4486

Citation: Shrestha S, Sharma S, Gupta R, Bhattarai R. Impact of global climate change on stream low flows: A case study of the great Miami river watershed, Ohio, USA. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2019; 12(1): 84–95.

Keywords


climate change, low flows, SWAT, climate models, Great Miami River Watershed

Full Text:

PDF

References


Haag W R, Warren Jr M L. Effects of severe drought on freshwater mussel assemblages. Trans Amer Fish Soc., 2008; 137(4): 1165–1178.

Gibson J R, Najjar R G. The response of Chesapeake Bay salinity to climate-induced changes in streamflow. Limnol Oceanogr, 2000; 45(8): 1764–1772.

Kundzewicz Z W, Mata L J, Arnell N W, Döll P, Jimenez B, Miller K, et al. The implications of projected climate change for freshwater resources and their management. Hydrolog Sci J. 2008; 3–10.

Moser H, Peter J H, Øivind A, Pierre G, Stephan M, Kathleen W. Impacts of climate change on navigation. In Navigation Seminar following PIANC AGA, 2008.

Saunders III J F, Murphy M, Clark M, Lewis Jr W M. The influence of climate variation on the estimation of low flows used to protect water quality: A nationwide assessment 1. J Am Water Resour As., 2004; 40(5):

–1349.

Burn D H, Buttle J M, Caissie D, MacCulloch G, Spence C, Stahl K. The processes, patterns and impacts of low flows across Canada. Can Water Resour J, 2008; 33(2): 107–124.

Smakhtin V U. Low flow hydrology: a review. J Hydrol., 2001; 240(3-4): 147–86.

Trenberth K E. Conceptual framework for changes of extremes of the hydrological cycle with climate change. In Weather and Climate Extremes, 1999; pp.327–339. Springer, Dordrecht.

Pathak P, Kalra A, Ahmad S, Bernardez M. Wavelet-aided analysis to estimate seasonal variability and dominant periodicities in temperature, precipitation, and streamflow in the Midwestern United States. Water Resour Manag, 2016; 30(13): 4649–65.

Abtew W, Melesse A. Climate change and evapotranspiration. In Evaporation and Evapotranspiration, 2013; pp.197–202. Springer, Dordrecht.

Pachauri R K, Allen M R, Barros V R, Broome J, Cramer W, Christ R, et al. Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC; 2014.

Tian H, Chen G, Liu M, Zhang C, Sun G, Lu C, et al. Model estimates of net primary productivity, evapotranspiration, and water use efficiency in the terrestrial ecosystems of the southern United States during 1895–2007. Forest Ecol Manag., 2010; 259(7): 1311–1327.

Hayhoe K, Wake C P, Huntington T G, Luo L, Schwartz M D, Sheffield J, et al. Past and future changes in climate and hydrological indicators in the US Northeast. Clim Dynam, 2007; 28(4): 381–407.

Huang S, Krysanova V, Hattermann F. Projection of low flow conditions in Germany under climate change by combining three RCMs and a regional hydrological model. Acta Geophysica, 2013; 61(1): 151–193.

Vaze J, Post D A, Chiew F H, Perraud J M, Viney N R, Teng J. Climate non-stationarity–validity of calibrated rainfall–runoff models for use in climate change studies. J Hydrol, 2010; 394(3-4): 447–457.

Gain A K, Apel H, Renaud F G, Giupponi C. Thresholds of hydrologic flow regime of a river and investigation of climate change impact—the case of the Lower Brahmaputra river Basin. Clim Change, 2013; 120(1-2): 463–75.

Teshager A D, Gassman P W, Schoof J T, Secchi S. Assessment of impacts of agricultural and climate change scenarios on watershed water quantity and quality, and crop production. Hydrol Earth Syst Sc, 2016; 20(8): 3325–3342.

Panagopoulos Y, Gassman P W, Arritt R W, Herzmann D E, Campbell T D, Valcu A, et al. Impacts of climate change on hydrology, water quality and crop productivity in the Ohio-Tennessee River Basin. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2015; 8(3): 29–46.

Wang R, Bowling L C, Cherkauer K A, Cibin R, Her Y, Chaubey I. Biophysical and hydrological effects of future climate change including trends in CO2, in the St. Joseph River watershed, Eastern Corn Belt. Agr Water Manag, 2017; 180: 280–296.

Culbertson A M, Martin J F, Aloysius N, Ludsin S A. Anticipated impacts of climate change on 21st century Maumee River discharge and nutrient loads. J Great Lakes Res., 2016; 42(6): 1332–1342.

Verma S, Bhattarai R, Bosch N S, Cooke R C, Kalita P K, Markus M. Climate change impacts on flow, sediment and nutrient export in a Great Lakes watershed using SWAT. CLEAN-Soil Air Water, 2015; 43(11): 1464–1474.

Cousino L K, Becker R H, Zmijewski K A. Modeling the effects of climate change on water, sediment, and nutrient yields from the Maumee River watershed. J Hydrol Reg Stud., 2015; 4: 762–775.

Arnell N W. Effects of IPCC SRES* emissions scenarios on river runoff: a global perspective. Hydrol Earth Syst Sc Dis, 2003; 7(5): 619–641.

Takle E S, Gutowski W J, Arritt R W, Pan Z, Anderson C J, Da Silva R R, et al. Project to intercompare regional climate simulations (PIRCS): description and initial results. J Geophys Res-Atmos, 1999; 104(D16): 19443–19461.

Rinke A, Dethloff K, Cassano J J, Christensen J H, Curry J A, Du P, et al. Evaluation of an ensemble of Arctic regional climate models: spatiotemporal fields during the SHEBA year. Clim Dynam, 2006; 26(5): 459–472.

Mohammed I N, Bomblies A, Wemple B C. The use of CMIP5 data to simulate climate change impacts on flow regime within the Lake Champlain Basin. J Hydrol Reg Stud., 2015; 3: 160–186.

Middelkoop H, Daamen K, Gellens D, Grabs W, Kwadijk J C, Lang H, et al. Impact of climate change on hydrological regimes and water resources management in the Rhine basin. Clim Change, 2001; 49(1-2): 105–128.

Shabalova M V, Van Deursen W P, Buishand T A. Assessing future discharge of the river Rhine using regional climate model integrations and a hydrological model. Clim Res, 2003; 23(3): 233–246.

Unawardhana L N, Kazama S. A water availability and low-flow analysis of the Tagliamento River discharge in Italy under changing climate conditions. Hydrol Earth Syst Sc., 2012; 16(3): 1033–1045.

Gain A K, Immerzeel W W, Sperna Weiland F C, Bierkens M F. Impact of climate change on the stream flow of the lower Brahmaputra: trends in high and low flows based on discharge-weighted ensemble modelling. Hydrol Earth Syst Sc., 2011; 15(5): 1537–1545.

Small D, Islam S, Vogel R M. Trends in precipitation and streamflow in the eastern US: Paradox or perception? Geophys Res Lett, 2006; 33(3).

Schoen M E, Small M, DeKay M L, Casman E, Kroll C. Effect of climate change on design-period low flows in the Mid-Atlantic US. In World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2007: Restoring Our Natural Habitat, 2007; pp.1–14.

Mahmood R, Jia S, Babel M S. Potential impacts of climate change on water resources in the Kunhar River Basin, Pakistan. Water, 2016; 8(1): 23.

Cervi F, Petronici F, Castellarin A, Marcaccio M, Bertolini A, Borgatti L. Climate-change potential effects on the hydrological regime of freshwater springs in the Italian Northern Apennines. Sci Total Environ, 2018; 622:337–348.

Marx A, Kumar R, Thober S, Rakovec O, Wanders N, Zink M, et al. Climate change alters low flows in Europe under global warming of 1.5, 2, and 3°C. Hydrol Earth Syst Sc, 2018; 22(2): 1017–1032.

Kreye P, Woerner V, Gelleszun M, Meon G. Model based projection of changes in low flow situations due to climate change in the federal state of Lower Saxony. Hydrol Wasserbewirts, 2017; 61(4): 217–231.

Stumbaugh M, Hamlet A F. Effects of climate change on extreme low-flows in small lowland tributaries in the Skagit River Basin. Northwest Sci., 2016; 90(1): 44–56.

Dang Q T, Laux P, Kunstmann H. Future high-and low-flow estimations for Central Vietnam: a hydro-meteorological modelling chain approach. Hydrol Sci J., 2017; 62(11): 1867–1889.

Mozayyan M, Akhoond Ali A M, Massah Bavani A R, Radmanesh F, Gohari A. Impacts of Climate Change on Low Flows at Tang Panj Sezar Subbasin, Southwest of Iran. J Hydrol Eng, 2017; 22(11): 05017021.

Parry M. Scenarios for climate impact and adaptation assessment. Glob Environ Change, 2002; 12: 149–153.

Tian Y, Xu Y P, Ma C, Wang G. Modeling the impact of climate change on low flows in Xiangjiang River Basin with Bayesian averaging method. J Hydrol Eng., 2017; 22(9): 04017035.

Laaha G, Parajka J, Viglione A, Koffler D, Haslinger K, Schöner W, et al. A three-pillar approach to assessing climate impacts on low flows. Hydrol Earth Syst Sc, 2016; 20(9): 3967–3985.

Kay A L, Bell V A, Guillod B P, Jones R G, Rudd A C. National-scale analysis of low flow frequency: historical trends and potential future changes. Clim Change, 2018; 147(3-4): 585–599.

Moss R H, Edmonds J A, Hibbard K A, Manning M R, Rose S K, van Vuuren D P, et al. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature, 2010; 463(7282): 747.

Van Vuuren D P, Edmonds J, Kainuma M, Riahi K, Thomson A, Hibbard K, et al. The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Change, 2011; 109(1-2): 5.

Arnold J G, Srinivasan R, Muttiah R S, Williams J R. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development 1. J Am Water Resour As, 1998; 34(1): 73–89.

Zuo D, Xu Z, Zhao J, Abbaspour K C, Yang H. Response of runoff to climate change in the Wei River basin, China. Hydrol Sci J., 2015; 60(3): 508–522.

Babur M, Babel M S, Shrestha S, Kawasaki A, Tripathi N K. Assessment of climate change impact on reservoir inflows using multi climate-models under RCPs—The case of Mangla Dam in Pakistan. Water, 2016; 8(9): 389.

Mohammed K, Saiful Islam A K, Tarekul Islam G M, Alfieri L, Bala S K, Uddin Khan M J. Impact of high-end climate change on floods and low flows of the Brahmaputra River. J Hydrol Eng., 2017; 22(10): 04017041.

Eisner S, Flörke M, Chamorro A, Daggupati P, Donnelly C, Huang J, et al.

An ensemble analysis of climate change impacts on streamflow seasonality across 11 large river basins. Clim Change, 2017; 141(3): 401–17.

Xu H, Luo Y. Climate change and its impacts on river discharge in two climate regions in China. Hydrol Earth Syst Sc, 2015; 19(11): 4609–4618.

Piniewski M, Szcześniak M, Kundzewicz Z W, Mezghani A, Hov Ø. Changes in low and high flows in the Vistula and the Odra basins: Model projections in the European-scale context. Hydrol Process, 2017; 31(12): 2210–2225.

Leta O, El-Kadi A, Dulai H. Impact of climate change on daily streamflow and its extreme values in pacific island watersheds. Sustainability, 2018; 10(6): 2057.

Hwang S, Graham W D. Assessment of alternative methods for statistically downscaling daily GCM precipitation outputs to simulate regional streamflow. J Am Water Resour As, 2014; 50(4): 1010–1032.

Pal I, Towler E, Livneh B. How can we better understand low river flows as climate changes. Eos (Washington. DC), 2015; 96.

Ayers J, Ficklin D L, Stewart I T, Strunk M. Comparison of CMIP3 and CMIP5 projected hydrologic conditions over the Upper Colorado River Basin. Int J Climatol, 2016; 36(11): 3807–3818.

Jothityangkoon C, Sivapalan M, Farmer D L. Process controls of water balance variability in a large semi-arid catchment: downward approach to hydrological model development. J Hydrol, 2001; 254(1-4): 174–198.

Taylor K E, Stouffer R J, Meehl G A. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. B Am Meteorol Soc, 2012; 93(4): 485–498.

Meehl G A, Moss R, Taylor K E, Eyring V, Stouffer R J, Bony S, et al. Climate model intercomparisons: Preparing for the next phase. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union., 2014; 95(9): 77–78.

Wilby R L, Harris I. A framework for assessing uncertainties in climate change impacts: Low-flow scenarios for the River Thames, UK. Water Resour Res, 2006; 42(2).

Jenkins G, Lowe J. Handling uncertainties in the UKCIP02 scenarios of climate change. Hadley Centre, Technical note 44, Exeter, UK. 2003.

OEPA. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. Total Maximum Daily Loads for the Mad River Watershed, 2009.

Neitsch S L, Arnold J G, Kiniry J R, Williams J R. Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation version 2009. Texas Water Resources Institute, 2011.

Johnson R R. An investigation of curve number applicability to watersheds in excess of 25000 hectares (250 km2). J Environ Hydrol, 1998; 6(10).

DEM. Digital elevation model. http://www.seamless.usgs.gov Accessed on [2010-01-10].

NLCD. National Land Cover Dataset. National landcover data set. http://www.epa.gov/mrlc/nlcd-2011.html Accessed on [2010-01-05].

USDA-NRCS (U.S. Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service). Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database. 2005. http://www.ncgc.nrcs.usda.gov/products/datasets/ssurgo/ index.html. Accessed on [2010-01-10].

Winchell M, Srinivasan R, Di Luzio M, Arnold J. ArcSWAT interface for SWAT2012: user's guide. Blackland Research and Extension Center, Texas Agrilife Research. Grassland. Soil and Water Research Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Texas, 2013; 3.

National Climatic Data Center, 2011. Climate data online. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/ncdc.html. Accessed on [2010-01-10].

Enforcement, E.P.A., Compliance History Online Metadata, 2015. https://edg.epa.gov/metadata/catalog/search/resource/details.page?uuid=%7B5DF97189-37B4-421E-B74C-C225EECC423F%7D. Accessed on

-01-10].

Abbaspour K C, Vejdani M, Haghighat S, Yang J. SWAT-CUP calibration and uncertainty programs for SWAT. In MODSIM 2007 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, 2007; pp.1596–1602.

Sharma S, Srivastava P, Fang X, Kalin L. Incorporating climate variability for point-source discharge permitting in a complex river system. T ASABE, 2012; 55(6): 2213–2228.

Moriasi D N, Gitau M W, Pai N, Daggupati P. Hydrologic and water quality models: Performance measures and evaluation criteria. T ASABE. 2015; 58(6): 1763–1785.

Krause P, Boyle D P, Bäse F. Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Adv Geosciences, 2005; 5: 89–97.

Santhi C, Srinivasan R, Arnold J G, Williams J R. A modeling approach to evaluate the impacts of water quality management plans implemented in a watershed in Texas. Environ Modell Softw, 2006; 21(8): 1141–1157.

Singh J, Knapp H V, Arnold J G, Demissie M. Hydrological modeling of the Iroquois river watershed using HSPF and SWAT 1. J Am Water Resour As., 2005; 41(2): 343–360.

Brekke L, Thrasher B L, Maurer E P, Pruitt T. Downscaled CMIP3 and CMIP5 climate and hydrology projections: Release of downscaled CMIP5 climate projections, comparison with preceding information, and summary of user needs. US Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Technical Services Center, Denver, 2013.

Maurer E P, Hidalgo H G. Utility of daily vs. monthly large-scale climate data: an intercomparison of two statistical downscaling methods. Hydrol Earth Syst Sc Discussions, 2007; 4(5): 3413–3440.

Hwang S, Graham W D. Development and comparative evaluation of a stochastic analog method to downscale daily GCM precipitation. Hydrol Earth Syst Sc, 2013; 17(11): 4481–4502.

Maurer E P, Ficklin D L, Wang W. Technical Note: The impact of spatial scale in bias correction of climate model output for hydrologic impact studies. Hydrol Earth Syst Sc Discussions, 2016; 20: 685–696.

Dilks D W, Freedman P L, Monson B A. Technical guidance manual for performing waste load allocations, 1992.

Stephan C E, Mount D I, Hansen D J, Gentile J H, Chapman G A, Brungs W A. Guidelines for deriving numerical national water quality criteria for the protection of aquatic organisms and their uses. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency; 1985.

Rossman L A. DFLOW user's manual. 1990. Available at: https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=30001JEH.TXT Accessed on [2010-01-10].

Gassman P W, Sadeghi A M, Srinivasan R. Applications of the SWAT model special section: Overview and insights. J Environ Qual., 2014; 43(1): 1–8.

Pease L A, Fausey N R, Martin J F, Brown L C. Projected climate change effects on subsurface drainage and the performance of controlled drainage in the Western Lake Erie Basin. J Soil Water Conserv, 2017; 72(3): 240–250.

Douglas E M, Vogel R M, Kroll C N. Trends in floods and low flows in the United States: impact of spatial correlation. J Hydrol., 2000; 240(1-2): 90–105.

Cousino L K, Becker R H, Zmijewski K A. Modeling the effects of climate change on water, sediment, and nutrient yields from the Maumee River watershed. J Hydrol., 2015; 4: 762–775.

Green T R, Kipka H, David O, McMaster G S. Where is the USA Corn Belt, and how is it changing? Science of the Total Environment, 2017; 618: 1613–1618.




Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering



2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office