Performance evaluation of lateral canopy shakers with catch frame for continuous harvesting of oranges for juice industry

Rafael R. Sola-Guirado, Sergio Castro-Garcia, Gregorio L. Blanco-Roldán, Jesús A. Gil-Ribes, Emilio J. González-Sánchez

Abstract


Citrus is mainly oriented to fresh consumption, and harvesting is usually performed manually. However, the high cost of harvesting and the low availability of labour can compromise the profitability of the crop when it is destined to juice industry. The development of citrus mechanical harvesting for industrial processing is conditioned to reach a high fruit removal efficiency, with a reduced damage to both fruit and trees. The current machines available are very large, requiring extensive plantations with long rows of trees to be efficient. In this study, two lateral canopy shakers equipped with a catch frame were evaluated to harvest independently both sides of the hedge on intensive citrus plantations with the main objective of determining their performance and feasibility. The lateral canopy shakers tested were three tractor-drawn machines, one commercial machine and two prototypes. The tested machines reached a mean value of 78% of fruit removal. Besides, the prototypes, equipped with a catch frame, were able to recover a mean value of 70% of yield. Although the results were promising, for achieving an efficient result, the application of this harvesting technology still requires a process of improvement, and the adaptation of both the machine and the plantation. The machines should reduce the amount of post-harvest ground fruit (5.9%-10.4%). Tree damages generated by the contact of the catch frame with the trunk and the metal rods with main branches were the most relevant. Therefore, it is still necessary to increase the ground speed of the machinery and improving the design of the rods, regulating the rod penetrating deep in the canopy to improve the fruit recovery and limit the damage caused to the trees.
Keywords: harvester, mechanical harvesting, fruit removal, tree damage, Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20201303.4998

Citation: Sola-Guirado R R, Castro-Garcia S, Blanco-Roldán G L, Gil-Ribes J A, González-Sánchez E J. Performance evaluation of lateral canopy shakers with catch frame for continuous harvesting of oranges for juice industry. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2020; 13(3): 88–93.

Keywords


harvester, mechanical harvesting, fruit removal, tree damage, Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck

Full Text:

PDF

References


FAOSTAT. Citrus fruit fresh and processed. Statistical bulletin. 2016. http://www.fao.org/economic/est/est-commodities/citricos/es/. Accessed on [2019-02-10].

Brotons-Martínez J M, Martin-Gorriz B, Torregrosa A, Porras I. Economic evaluation of mechanical harvesting of lemons. Outlook Agr, 2018; 47: 44–50.

Junta de Andalucía. Observatorio de precios y mercados. Costes medios de producción. Campaña 2016-17 [Average production costs. 2016-17 season]. 2017. http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/ agriculturaypesca/observatorio. Accessed on [2019-02-10]

Sanders K F. Orange harvesting systems review. Biosyst Eng, 2005; 90: 115–125.

Roka F M, Hyman B R. Mechanical harvesting of sweet oranges for juice processing. Acta Horticulturae, 2012; 965: 241–244.

Pu Y J, Toudeshki A, Ehsani R, Yang F, Abdulridha J. Selection and experimental evaluation of shaking rods of canopy shaker to reduce tree damage for citrus mechanical harvesting. Int J Agr Biol Eng, 2018; 11(2): 48–54.

Roka F M, Ehsani R J, Futch S H, Hyman B R. Citrus mechanical harvesting systems - Continuous canopy shakers. Florida: Food and economic Resources Department, UF/IFAS Extension, 2014.

Sola-Guirado R R, Jimenez-Jimenez F, Blanco-Roldan G L, Castro-Garcia S, Castillo-Ruiz F J, Gil Ribes J A. Vibration parameters assessment to develop a continuous lateral canopy shaker for mechanical harvesting of traditional olive trees. Span J Agric Res, 2016; 14(2): e0204.

Ferguson L, Castro Garcia S. Transformation of an ancient crop: Preparing California ‘Manzanillo’ table olives for mechanical harvesting. Horttechnology, 2014; 24: 274–280.

Sola-Guirado R R, Castro-García S, Blanco-Roldán G L, Jiménez-Jiménez F, Castillo-Ruiz F J, Gil-Ribes J A. Traditional olive tree response to oil olive harvesting technologies. Biosyst Eng, 2014; 118: 186–193.

Ferreira Júnior L G, da Silva F M, Ferreira D D, Sales R S. Recommendation for mechanical harvesting of coffee based on vibration behavior settings rods harvesters. Cienc Rural, 2016; 46: 273–278.

Yu P, Li C, Takeda F, Krewer G, Rains G, Hamrita T. Measurement of mechanical impacts created by rotary, slapper, and sway blueberry mechanical harvesters. Comput Electron Agr, 2014; 101: 84–92.

DeVetter L W, Yang W Q, Takeda F, Korthuis S, Li C. Modified over-the-row machine harvesters to improve northern highbush blueberry fresh fruit quality. Agriculture (Switzerland), 2019; 9: 13.

Gupta S K, Ehsani R, Kim N H. Optimization of a citrus canopy shaker harvesting system: Mechanistic tree damage and fruit detachment models. Trans ASABE, 2016; 59: 761–776.

Zhou J, He L, Zhang Q, Du X, Chen D, Karkee M. Evaluation of the influence of shaking frequency and duration in mechanical harvesting of sweet cherry. Appl Eng Agr, 2013; 29: 607–612.

Savary S K J U, Ehsani R, Schueller J K, Rajaraman B P. Simulation study of citrus tree canopy motion during harvesting using a canopy shaker. Trans ASABE, 2010; 53: 1373–1381.

Shamshiri R, Ehsani R, Maja J M, Roka F M. Determining machine efficiency parameters for a citrus canopy shaker using yield monitor data. Appl Eng Agr, 2013; 29: 33–41.

Ortiz C, Blasco J, Balasch S, Torregrosa A. Shock absorbing surfaces for

collecting fruit during the mechanical harvesting of citrus. Biosyst Eng, 2011; 110: 2–9.

He L, Fu H, Sun D, Karkee M, Zhang Q. Shake-And-catch harvesting for fresh market apples in trellis-Trained trees. Trans ASABE, 2017; 60: 353–360.

Roka F M, Hyman B R. Mechanical harvesting of sweet oranges for juice processing. Acta Hortic, 2012; 965: 241–244.

Juste F, Fornes I, Castillo S. Tree configuration and fruit distribution of citrus for mechanical harvesting. Fruit, Nut and Vegetable Production Engineering, 1993; 17–27.

Ferguson J J, Wardowski W F. Factors affecting fruit quality. Citrus research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, Florida. 1988

Liu T H, Ehsani R, Toudeshki A, Zou X J, Wang H J. Experimental study of vibrational acceleration spread and comparison using three citrus canopy shaker shaking tines. Shock Vib, 2017. ID 9827926.

Castro-Garcia S, Sola-Guirado R R, Gil-Ribes J A.. Vibration analysis of the fruit detachment process in late-season ‘Valencia’ orange with canopy shaker technology. Biosyst Eng, 2018; 170: 130–137.

Liu T H, Luo G, Ehsani R, Toudeshki A, Zou X J, Wang H J. Simulation study on the effects of tine-shaking frequency and penetrating depth on fruit detachment for citrus canopy-shaker harvesting. Comput Electron Agr, 2018; 148: 54–62.

Whitney J D, Elezaby A, Castle W S, Wheaton T A, Littell R C. Citrus tree spacing effects on soil water use, root density, and fruit yield. Trans ASAE, 1991; 34: 129–134.

Roka F M, Burns J K, Buker R S. Mechanical harvesting without abscission agents-yield impacts on late season 'Valencia' oranges. Proc Fl State Hort Soc, 2005; 118: 25–27.

Spann T M, Danyluk M D. Mechanical harvesting increases leaf and stem debris in loads of mechanically harvested citrus fruit. HortScience, 2010; 45: 1297–1300.

Liu T H, Luo G, Ehsani R, Toudeshki A, Zou X J, Wang H J. Simulation study on the effects of tine-shaking frequency and penetrating depth on fruit detachment for citrus canopy-shaker harvesting. Comput Electron Agr, 2018; 148: 54–62.

Sola-Guirado R R, Blanco-Roldan G L, Castro-Garcia S, Castillo-Ruiz F J, Gil-Ribes J A. An innovative circular path harvester for mechanical harvesting of irregular, large-canopy olive trees. Int J Agric Biol Eng, 2018; 11(3): 86–93.




Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office