Fukushima wastewater release: unanswered questions and global concerns

Samuel Ariyo Okaiyeto, Parag Prakash Sutar, Parag Prakash Sutar, Arun S. Mujumdar, Arun S. Mujumdar, Hongwei Xiao, Hongwei Xiao

Abstract


The decision by Japan to begin discharging the Fukushima wastewater into the ocean on August 24, 2023 was followed by protests from several countries, including China, Russia, Korea, Vietnam, and deep concerns from the international community. This decision is related to the aftermath of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster that occurred in 2011, which destroyed the cooling system of the nuclear power plant and caused the reactor cores to overheat. Much water was used to cool down the reactors fuel rods; about 1.3 million cubic meters contaminated water with highly radioactive material was generated, which can fill more than 500 Olympic swimming pools[1]. In order to reduce the levels of radioactivity, an Advanced Liquid Processing System (ALPS) was used to remove most radioactive contaminants from water. ALPS works by circulating water through a system of tanks and filters, which removes specific contaminants such as cesium and strontium, using a multi-step process that includes coagulation, flocculation, ion exchange, and absorption[1]. Japan's government and some scientists have argued that the ALPS-treated water is safe for release into the ocean. According to their claims, the discharged water poses minimal risk to human health and the environment. However, concerns about the long-term effects of this discharge remain in scientists ‘minds.
Keywords: Fukushima, wastewater, nuclear disaster, discharge, radioactive contaminants
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20241702.9076

Citation: Okaiyeto S A, Sutar P P, Mujumdar A S, Xiao H W. Fukushima wastewater release: unanswered questions and global concerns. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2024; 17(2): 289–290.

Keywords


Fukushima, wastewater, nuclear disaster, discharge, radioactive contaminants

Full Text:

PDF

References


Sylvester P, Milner T, Jensen J. Radioactive liquid waste treatment at Fukushima Daiichi. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 2013; 88(9): 1592–1596. doi: 10.1002/jctb.4141

Nogrady B. Is Fukushima wastewater release safe? What the science says. Nature, 2023; 618: 894-895. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-02057-y

Men W. Discharge of contaminated water from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident into the Northwest Pacific: What is known and what needs to be known. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2021; 173: 112984. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112984.

International Agency Atomic Agency (IAEA) (2023). Comprehensive report on the safety review of the ALPS-treated water at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station. Accessed 12 September, 2023 https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/iaea_comprehensive_alps_report.pdf

Huang Y, Qin M, Lai J L, Liang J C, Luo X, Li C. Assessing OBT formation and enrichment: ROS signaling is involved in the radiation hormesis induced by tritium exposure in algae. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2023; 443: 130159. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4179079 .

Li S R, Zhang Y F, Xue H Y, Zhang Q X, Chen N, Wan J, et al. Integrative effects based on behavior, physiology and gene expression of tritiated water on zebrafish. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2021; 225: 112770 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112770.

Madigan D J, Baumann Z, Fisher N S. Pacific bluefin tuna transport Fukushima-derived radionuclides from Japan to California. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012; 109(24): 9483–9486. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204859109.

Chen G X, Wang Q, Chu X Q. Accelerated spread of Fukushima's waste water by ocean circulation. The Innovation, 2021; 2(2): 100119. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100119.




Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office