Performance of no-till corn precision planter equipped with row cleaners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25165/ijabe.v8i5.1846Keywords:
row cleaner, corn production, no-till planter, wheat residue management, annual double cropping systemAbstract
In the continuous annual wheat-corn cropping area of North China Plain, no-till planting that promotes soil conservation and crop yield while reducing operation cost has been gradually accepted by local farmers. However, previous wheat residue is the main limiting factor affecting the performance of existing planters in placing seeds at uniform spacing and optimum depth in residue covered fields. In order to solve this problem, a kind of ground-wheel-driven row cleaner was designed, developed and mounted on row units of a four-row pneumatic precision planter. The planter has two adjacent row units equipped with the newly designed row cleaners and the other two adjacent row units equipped with the commonly used inactive row cleaners. This was used for planting at three forward speeds (4 km/h, 6 km/h and 8 km/h) into half residue (HR) and whole residue (WR) plots. The amount of residue removal, seeding depth, emergence rate and indices of uniformity in seed spacing (missing-seeding index, quality of feeding index and precision index) were measured. The newly designed row cleaner performed better with regard to residue removal, with the average percentage of residue cleared as 63.0% compared to 40.3% for the inactive row cleaner. For the HR and WR plots, percentage of residue cleared of the newly designed row cleaner reached 57.1% and 68.9% respectively, suggesting that the newly designed row cleaner can work more effectively at high residue level. By contrast, with the percentage of residue cleared of the inactive row cleaner as 43.1% and 37.5% in HR and WR plots, suggesting that the inactive row cleaner just can work effectively under low residue condition. Values of missing-seeding index, QFI, precision index, coefficient of variation of depth and percent emergence for the newly designed row cleaner under whole residue level are comparable to those for the inactive row cleaner under half residue level. The result indicates that the effect of using the newly designed row cleaner is equal to that of reducing surface residue, and can help to maintain the uniformity of seed spacing and seeding depth. The newly designed row cleaner generally performed better at forward speed of 6 km/h, based on the distribution of seeds along rows and seeding depth uniformity. Keywords: row cleaner, corn production, no-till planter, wheat residue management, annual double cropping system DOI: 10.3965/j.ijabe.20150805.1846 Citation: Yang L, Zhang R, Gao N, Cui T, Liu Q W, Zhang D X. Performance of no-till corn precision planter equipped with row cleaners. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2015; 8(5): 15-25.References
Huang G B, Zhang R Z, Li G D, Li L L, Chan K Y, Heenan D P, et al. Productivity and sustainability of a spring wheat-field pea rotation in a semi-arid environment under conventional and conservation tillage systems. Field Crops Research, 2008; 107(1): 43–55. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2007.12. 011
Cookson W R, Murphy D V, Roper M M. Characterizing the relationships between soil organic matter components and microbial function and composition along a tillage disturbance gradient. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2008; 40(3): 763–777. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.10.011
Buschiazzo D E, Zobeckd T M, Abascal S A. Wind erosion quantity and quality of an Entic Haplustoll of the semi-arid pampas of Argentina. Journal of Arid Environments, 2007; 69(1): 29–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.08.013
Sun H Y, Zhang X Y, Chen S Y, Pei D, Liu C M. Effects of harvest and sowing time on the performance of the rotation of winter wheat-summer maize in the North China Plain. Industrial Crops and Products, 2007; 25(3): 239–247. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2006.12.003
Liu L J. Systematic Experiments and Effect Analysis of All Year Conservation Tillage in Two Crops a Year Region. Doctoral dissertation. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2004. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Chen J D, Li H W. Study on anti-blocking mechanism of no-till planter for whole maize stalk mulching land. Journal of Beijing Agricultural Engineering University, 1994; 14(3): 34–39. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zhang Y W. Study on PTO driven disc cutter. Journal of China Agricultural University, 1999; 4(6): 38–40. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zhang J G, Gao H W. Study on the strip chopping anti-blocking mechanism. Transactions of the CSAM, 2000; 31(4): 33–35. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn. 1000-1298.2000.04.009
Wu J M, Gao H W. Design and experiment for a saw bit anti-blockage cutter of no-till planter. Trans. CSAM, 2006; 37(5): 51–53. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zhang X R, He J, Li H W, Li W Y. Design of the powered-chain anti-blocking mechanism for wheat no-till planter. Transactions of the CSAM, 2009; 40(10): 44–48. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zhu H B. Study on Anti-blocking Device of No-till Wheat Planter for Broken and Crushing Rice Crop Stubble. Doctoral dissertation. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2013. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zhao J L, Jia H L, Guo M Z, Jiang X M, Qu W J, Wang G. Design and experiment of supported roll-cutting anti-blocking mechanism with for no-till planter. Transactions of the CSAE, 2014; 30(10): 18–28. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zhao W Y, Zhang F W, Wu J F, Han Z S, Wu J M. Design of a spring tooth anti-blocking mechanism for no-till planter. Transactions of the CSAM, 2007; 38(3): 188–190. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Gao H W, Li H W, Yao Z L. Study on the Chinese light no-till seeders. Transactions of the CSAM, 2008; 39(4): 78–82. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Skeeles J, Brandt D. Reduction of stand losses in no-till corn with row cleaners. I.P.M. Ohio State University Extension, Ohio, USA, 1993.
Raoufat M H, Mahmoodieh R A. Stand establishment responses of maize to seedbed residue, seed drill coulters and primary tillage systems. Biosystems Engineering, 2005; 90(3): 261–269.
Bahrani M J, Ghadiri H, Raoufat M H. Influence of wheat residue rates on irrigated corn yield and yield components in a modified reduced tillage system. Progress report, Project # 1223664, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran, 2005
Raoufat M H, Matbooei A. Row cleaners enhance reduced tillage planting of corn in Iran. Soil and Tillage Research, 2007; 93(1): 152–161. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2006.03.026
Fallahi S, Raoufat M H. Row-crop planter attachments in a conservation tillage system: A comparative study. Soil and Tillage Research, 2008; 98(1): 27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.still. 2007.10.005
Gu Y B, Zhang Y W, Song J L. A study on laminar flow splitter as blockage proofing device for mulching no-tillage planters. Transactions of the CSAM, 1994; 25(1): 46–51. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Katchman S D, Smith J A. Alternative measures of accuracy in plant spacing for planter using single seed metering. Transactions of the ASAE, 1995; 38: 379–387.
Karayel D, Ozmerzi A. Effect of tillage methods on sowing uniformity of maize. Biosystems Engineering, 2002; 44: 23–26.
Erbach D C, Cruse R M, Crosbie T M, Timmors D R, Kasper T C, Potter K N. Maize response to tillage-induced soil conditions. Transactions of the ASAE, 1986; 29(3): 690–695.
Karayel D. Performance of a modified precision vacuum seeder for no-till sowing of maize and soybean. Soil and Tillage Research, 2009; 104: 121–125.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
IJABE is an international peer reviewed open access journal, adopting Creative Commons Copyright Notices as follows.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).